![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 23, '08 From Hawaii Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) ![]() |
that's actually not a bad way to do it.
the outer ring ID is probably -0.001 of what the OD of the old hub, if cut on a lathe, its pretty well balanced. interference press fit...the majority of the stud is still on the original hub so the ring takes a little of the slack. not much difference than some stuff I make at work for planes, actually never thought about this use on car hubs. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Dec 4, '11 From Greece Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
that's actually not a bad way to do it. the outer ring ID is probably -0.001 of what the OD of the old hub, if cut on a lathe, its pretty well balanced. interference press fit...the majority of the stud is still on the original hub so the ring takes a little of the slack. not much difference than some stuff I make at work for planes, actually never thought about this use on car hubs. that's what I would say if my English were good enough. Only one thing the outer ring is welded on the hub, then machined and balanced. It's one piece. o way it goes anywhere. I'll try to get some more pics if it's possible because it's installed now. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 19th, 2025 - 4:51 PM |