ST to GT brake conversion |
ST to GT brake conversion |
Feb 10, 2016 - 3:36 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I finally got my brake conversion done and wanted to share some details. Brakes must be one of the Celica ST's weakest points. Or one of its best opportunities for improvement.
I got Celica GT rear backing plates with parking brake cables, a proportioning valve, plus four rear caliper bolts from ebay seller rude-day. The transaction went well and I would definitely buy from him again. The prop valve isn't essential but it's a good idea. After receiving these parts I disassembled, cleaned, lubricated, and reassembled the parking brake assemblies. You can use new or used calipers and rotors. I decided to buy all new ones. I got four new Brembo rotors. Here they are masked off and ready to paint: The GT front rotor will bolt right up to the ST suspension. The disc just barely touches the rear brake shield and it's easy to bend it back slightly by hand. Painted discs: GT front brake rotors are much bigger than ST rotors. I've gone to significant expense and effort to do similar brake conversions on Datsun 510s and 240Zs over the years, so it always surprises me when someone says this conversion is not worthwhile. To me, since it's an easy bolt-on, it's irresistable. First step in the rear brake installation is to disconnect the parking brake cables. The connection is inside the tunnel above the exhaust system. Make sure to release the hand brake. Remove the heat shield which is held in with four bolts, then disconnect the front ends of the cables. Working space was a little bit tight but I did not need to move the exhaust system. If your brake drums don't come off easily, find a couple of 8mm bolts which will thread into the holes in the drums. Run them down evenly until the drum comes off. With the drum removed, you can see the bolts that hold the spindle and backing plate onto the hub. Spindle removed: There are thin O-rings beneath the spindle. Be sure to keep track of them and reinstall them during reassembly. Replace them if they are brittle or damaged. Drum brake backing plate removed: Disc backing plate installed and held temporarily by one bolt while I checked the fit of the hand brake cables: Spindle, rotor and caliper installed: You'll need the proper brake hoses for the rear discs; the drum brake hoses won't work. Front brakes installed. These brake hoses are interchangeable. Car on scales. I recently installed Megan coilovers and wanted to check corner weights. Weights with full tank of fuel and no occupants. With no adjustment of coilovers at all. Not bad. This post has been edited by bryanf: Mar 29, 2022 - 9:53 PM -------------------- |
Feb 10, 2016 - 11:36 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 19, '09 From Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) |
Great write up. Looks clean.
Recently did mine as well. Didn't use a brake prop valve though. Can you shed some light on the results of using one? |
Feb 11, 2016 - 7:57 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 13, '14 From MIA Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
Excellent write up! Now you can swap to the Avalon front twin piston calipers.
-------------------- Rare JDM Dealer Option Parking(Proximitiy) Senor for sale
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=97051 |
Feb 11, 2016 - 2:56 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Great write up. Looks clean. Recently did mine as well. Didn't use a brake prop valve though. Can you shed some light on the results of using one? Sorry I don't have any specifics. Just know that the ST vs. GT prop valve is different and so to have the front-to-rear balance that Toyota intended with the GT brakes, one should use the GT valve. But how much different they are and how important it is, I don't know. -------------------- |
Feb 11, 2016 - 8:43 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 24, '08 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 33 (100%) |
Only the GT4 has a different part # for that valve. All other chassis are the same I'm 95% sure.
He should of done it from get go. Toyota museum says 94 GT lift back with ABS is 2,560 lbs. I'm amazed that the side to side weight distribution is so identical -------------------- Group buy to replicate Narrow E series transaxle parts
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107514 |
Feb 12, 2016 - 7:51 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 19, '09 From Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) |
Great write up. Looks clean. Recently did mine as well. Didn't use a brake prop valve though. Can you shed some light on the results of using one? Sorry I don't have any specifics. Just know that the ST vs. GT prop valve is different and so to have the front-to-rear balance that Toyota intended with the GT brakes, one should use the GT valve. But how much different they are and how important it is, I don't know. Ah ok. It's probably not that different but I'm sure it can't hurt. Thanks |
Feb 13, 2016 - 12:03 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 24, '08 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 33 (100%) |
trying to install a proportion valve isn't hard but the testing is what takes time and will eat away at your tires. as stated by tigawood. its been discussed before
This post has been edited by BonzaiCelica: Feb 13, 2016 - 12:04 AM -------------------- Group buy to replicate Narrow E series transaxle parts
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107514 |
Feb 13, 2016 - 9:42 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Got this from a testing spec in a Celica manual. It seems to indicate that the difference between the various proportioning valves is pretty significant.
At low pressures, balance is 50-50, but at higher pressures, rear proportion is reduced by varying amounts. So in everyday driving performance will be the same but with hard braking the difference matters. Somewhat... 1 kg/sq. cm. == 14.2 lb/sq.in. (psi) This post has been edited by bryanf: Mar 29, 2022 - 9:59 PM -------------------- |
Feb 17, 2016 - 12:18 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '09 From Albuquerque, NM Currently Offline Reputation: 19 (100%) |
Could you find it in your heart to do a quick write up on how to disassemble/reassemble the shoe mechanism in the backing plates? I'm about to do this swap myself!
-------------------- taking too long to mod since '09
June '12 COTM '95 AT200 |
Feb 17, 2016 - 3:42 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Could you find it in your heart to do a quick write up on how to disassemble/reassemble the shoe mechanism in the backing plates? I'm about to do this swap myself! http://bgbonline.celicatech.com/94_6gmanua...ke%20system.pdf Hope that helps. It's easy to do. -------------------- |
Feb 18, 2016 - 4:29 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 10, '14 From Tulsa, OK Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
Many thanks Bryanf for this post. I almost have everything except the rear calipers as they are seized and need new rotors, which caused me to stop the swap. Now I need to find GT proportioning valve. Do you by any chance know the part number for the rear rotors? My car is 96 ST hatchback
This post has been edited by msk59: Feb 18, 2016 - 4:31 PM |
Feb 18, 2016 - 8:03 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Brembo rotor part numbers:
Front: W0133-1818688 (25425) Rear: W0133-1833479 (25162) Toyota part numbers: Front : 43512-20630 Rear: 42431-20330 -------------------- |
Feb 19, 2016 - 1:08 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '09 From Albuquerque, NM Currently Offline Reputation: 19 (100%) |
Could you find it in your heart to do a quick write up on how to disassemble/reassemble the shoe mechanism in the backing plates? I'm about to do this swap myself! http://bgbonline.celicatech.com/94_6gmanua...ke%20system.pdf Hope that helps. It's easy to do. It even has all the torque values! Thanks so much, this'll be a big help. Great write up, too! -------------------- taking too long to mod since '09
June '12 COTM '95 AT200 |
Feb 19, 2016 - 11:36 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 10, '14 From Tulsa, OK Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
Thank You for the part numbers. Much appreciated.
|
Feb 23, 2016 - 5:43 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
The prop valves have different markings on the back:
This post has been edited by bryanf: Mar 29, 2022 - 10:00 PM -------------------- |
Feb 24, 2016 - 8:21 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 22, '06 From Columbia, MD Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
it would make sense that the GT and ST had different proportioning values. Do they have different part numbers?
-------------------- 1995 GT::::Diffusing the Situation エキサイティングカーレーシングチーム! march 2010 COTM : 6GC feature 2014 : january 2015-2016-2018 COTM |
Feb 24, 2016 - 12:44 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 26, '12 From Atlanta Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I should have mentioned these are non-ABS parts.
-------------------- |
Feb 24, 2016 - 3:05 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '09 From Albuquerque, NM Currently Offline Reputation: 19 (100%) |
it would make sense that the GT and ST had different proportioning values. Do they have different part numbers? I'll check when I get home - I have a GT prop valve sitting in a box for when I change my brakes out. -------------------- taking too long to mod since '09
June '12 COTM '95 AT200 |
Feb 24, 2016 - 3:57 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Jun 29, '08 From Denver Currently Online Reputation: 59 (100%) |
Different part numbers. GT is 47150-20240 and ST is 47150-20280.
-------------------- "Employ your time in improving yourself by other men's writings, so that you shall gain easily what others labored hard for." -Socrates. Even Socrates told us to use the search button!
2006 Aston Martin V8 Vantage. 1998 Celica GT- BEAMS Swapped. 2022 4Runner TRD Off Road Prenium. 2021 GMC Sierra AT4. |
Feb 24, 2016 - 5:00 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 11, '06 From Way South Chicago Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
The difference is because disc and drum rear brakes need different pressures but honestly you'd probably be OK reusing your ST valve. It's not a huge difference, I think drum rear apply a little less pressure out back so the rear disc brakes would apply a little less hard.
-------------------- |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 26th, 2024 - 10:51 PM |