Questions to the guys of 6gc |
Questions to the guys of 6gc |
Jul 18, 2007 - 3:43 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 4, '03 From Kirkland, Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I found this article on msn that asked these questions to guys. I just would like to see your guys answers
Thanks in advance Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend? Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? This post has been edited by BlackCelicaGT94: Jul 18, 2007 - 3:51 PM -------------------- Cruisin down the street in my Infiniti...always lookin for my next trip to Sin City
|
Jul 18, 2007 - 3:50 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend? Ummm too easy, and probably not long term material Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? no <---but this question confuses me? Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? yes Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? Meh no sexy time before the marriage time Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? eh |
Jul 18, 2007 - 7:24 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
Doesn't impact me at all. Do it when it feels right.
Basically this is asking about a one-night stand. Yes theres potential, but unlikelihood that it will be very serious. I don't think it matters. There is no "appropriate" time. Its whenever the two individuals feel right about it. This is assuming falling in bed early is a bad thing. It takes 2 to tango. Seems to me that this whole questionnaire is biased. Both men and women will sleep with each other early, but the girl gets the bad rap. Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. -------------------- |
Jul 18, 2007 - 8:59 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 6, '05 From South Carolina Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend?
Too easy, I prefer them to wait a bit actually. Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? Yeah I guess, but they tend to not work. Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? Yeah Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? A month is good for me or sometime around that. Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? Sex is Sex, lol |
Jul 18, 2007 - 9:18 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 8, '07 From Houston, Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 19, 2007 - 12:24 AM) [snapback]579990[/snapback] Doesn't impact me at all. Do it when it feels right. Basically this is asking about a one-night stand. Yes theres potential, but unlikelihood that it will be very serious. I don't think it matters. There is no "appropriate" time. Its whenever the two individuals feel right about it. This is assuming falling in bed early is a bad thing. It takes 2 to tango. Seems to me that this whole questionnaire is biased. Both men and women will sleep with each other early, but the girl gets the bad rap. Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. You are totally right. I agree 100% with this. -------------------- |
Jul 18, 2007 - 9:36 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 7, '05 From Corvallis, OR Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 18, 2007 - 7:24 PM) [snapback]579990[/snapback] Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. Wow....that's an absolutely absurd statement. Perhaps your forgetting that monogamy is fairly common among animals, and even some insects. For someone to say this suggests not only lack of any measure of personal morality, but a lifestyle significantly lower in conduct than that of most animals. ...thus said, I think you could guess my stance on the topic question. I'm with playr on this one. -------------------- |
Jul 19, 2007 - 12:18 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 1, '05 From Zagreb, Croatia Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend?
Thanks? Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? There definately are, but still, it all depends on one´s opening up for a new challenges...which most relationships in the beginning in fact are...I´d give a chance for that! Especially if the sex indeed was great! Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? No! I never liked fun and games when it comes to human emotions...even if they are as basic as those of a sexual nature, and if the fact of the matter is simply trust, I find that very easy to gain, since I never lie about anything...and it shows (those female extra senses really do come in handy every once in a while ) Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? It really doesn´t matter to me! The longest time for me not getting any in a relationship was eight MONTHS (when I was 19), and the shortest was about two or three days before the relationship actually started! Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? Of course! Cook breakfast in the morning! (I´m reall not a sexist pig all the time... ) -------------------- Another proud 6G Celica owner! |
Jul 19, 2007 - 12:26 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
there is a flaw to these questions. it implies that the problem will only be with how the guy sees the situation.
in my experience, if a girl is willing to sleep with you on the first date, then thats just what kind of girl she is, and she wasnt looking to develop anymore more then that. same can be said for the guy too... so the relationship will probably not last. btw, we can all tell whats on your mind. these kinds of "my friend has this problem..." questions always show through.lol -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
Jul 19, 2007 - 1:20 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 4, '03 From Kirkland, Washington Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
lol i have a boyfriend of 9 months and everything is fine in that department so these questions are just kinda just a curiousity thing not cuz im thinking of getting down early with anyone
-------------------- Cruisin down the street in my Infiniti...always lookin for my next trip to Sin City
|
Jul 19, 2007 - 1:31 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 23, '05 Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
this poll makes it though the woman is at fault if a couple has sex early. and these questions are backward from most of the girls ive been with. im usually the one that makes them wait initially. ive comfortable having sex early on in the relationship, depends on the girl, but i usually wait a month or two if i have serious interest in the girl.
This post has been edited by celicaST: Jul 19, 2007 - 1:34 AM -------------------- I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. |
Jul 19, 2007 - 2:15 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 10, '04 From Shoreline, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend?
Depends, its really a personal choice some girls are very open and others are closed. I think its too fast but it does not mean it cant be a long term thing. It seems like the faster things start the faster things stop. Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? Great sex is not enough to make a relationship last, you have to really connect in most all other sicrumstances[bad spelling] for it to last, however great sex is needed for it to last. to anser more directly, personaly I would always be open to a serious relationship and it would take a lot to get me in bed that fast so I would deff have to see potential. Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? Yes, but I dont think its ok to "Make you wait" it should come when both people are ready for it not when one decides the other can have it. best if you let nature decide where your both comfortable. Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? I waited 3 months with my current g/f, either of us wanted to rush anything so we just took it slow and let things happen as we wanted. worked out great I think, but its very much a person to person thing, I say 1 month maybe little more or less depending on how comfortable you are Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? Most important thing in a relation ship is to be yourself, no sence hidding who you really are to get the other one to like you, because there gana find out eventualy why waste time if its not going to work. Best I think would be to not make it a regular thing and make it known you want something serious. give it effort and dont play games. This post has been edited by creis: Jul 19, 2007 - 2:16 AM -------------------- |
Jul 19, 2007 - 1:32 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 18, 2007 - 7:24 PM) [snapback]579990[/snapback] Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. So what? Are you advocating avoiding marriage and monogamy because they are unnatural? I am sure you will agree that having offspring is "natural". If so, can I assume that you advocate having bastard children? And, when the parents get tired of one another, then it would be "unnatural" to stay together, right? Probably a great move for the "natural" desires of the parents - or at least one of them. I am not so sure about the kids - but screw them, right? The position is symptomatic of a real problem in our culture. Many people are too quick to do whatever "feels" good at the time regardless of their prior committments, the long term repercusions, or the effect that their decision has on others. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Jul 20, 2007 - 4:57 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 3, '06 From Czech Republic (Europe) Currently Offline Reputation: 56 (100%) |
QUOTE(BlackCelicaGT94 @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:43 PM) [snapback]579920[/snapback] Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend? No.. no impact. Even woman is just human QUOTE(BlackCelicaGT94 @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:43 PM) [snapback]579920[/snapback] Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? Sorry... to complicated English QUOTE(BlackCelicaGT94 @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:43 PM) [snapback]579920[/snapback] Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? No QUOTE(BlackCelicaGT94 @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:43 PM) [snapback]579920[/snapback] Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? Depends on many circumstances... QUOTE(BlackCelicaGT94 @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:43 PM) [snapback]579920[/snapback] Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? No affect onto period of relationship at all... -------------------- No more replicas... This is evolution... This is SS-four :)
________[Featured Celica of 6gc.net @ 2010]_________ |
Jul 20, 2007 - 9:52 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
QUOTE(tin_foil @ Jul 18, 2007 - 10:36 PM) [snapback]580032[/snapback] QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 18, 2007 - 7:24 PM) [snapback]579990[/snapback] Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. Wow....that's an absolutely absurd statement. Perhaps your forgetting that monogamy is fairly common among animals, and even some insects. For someone to say this suggests not only lack of any measure of personal morality, but a lifestyle significantly lower in conduct than that of most animals. ...thus said, I think you could guess my stance on the topic question. I'm with playr on this one. Your right. Monogamy is prevalent in many animals. It is less prevalent than polygamy. Some monogamy is also due to environmental restraints, where several partners are either difficult to obtain or unneeded. The reason for multiple partners is to spread their genes across as many lines of ancestry as possible, for the good of the species. If many animals resorted to only one partner, their species would diminish. Luckily for humans, it feels really good, so this is not an issue. As for your calling me immoral and lifestyle "significantly lower in conduct." Thats outright absurd, and shows how little you actually know. My moral standards have zero to do with what nature has determined. My lifestyle, has zero to do with what nature has determined. This is one BIG problem among people who have their heads up their asses regarding morality & natures. As if someone can't be moral and atheist. If you believe this, then theres absolutely no talking to you. QUOTE(jgreening @ Jul 19, 2007 - 2:32 PM) [snapback]580263[/snapback] QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 18, 2007 - 7:24 PM) [snapback]579990[/snapback] Marriage & monogamy are unnatural. So what? Are you advocating avoiding marriage and monogamy because they are unnatural? I am sure you will agree that having offspring is "natural". If so, can I assume that you advocate having bastard children? And, when the parents get tired of one another, then it would be "unnatural" to stay together, right? Probably a great move for the "natural" desires of the parents - or at least one of them. I am not so sure about the kids - but screw them, right? The position is symptomatic of a real problem in our culture. Many people are too quick to do whatever "feels" good at the time regardless of their prior committments, the long term repercusions, or the effect that their decision has on others. I think your way off base. Your wrongly aligning people who care not of anything but themselves, to people who hold a position about the true natural instinct of human beings. This is common among people who think you can't be moral w/o christianity and a god, and its absurd, purely absurd. You basically took something I said, and made up your own conclusions about things that have nothing to do with the argument at hand. You made a helluva lot of assumptions based on very little fact. You first off, assume I'm anti-marriage, anti-monogamy. I'm not, btw. Cute little fact for you to chew on. I said they were unnatural for us, not wrong. I've been in long-term relationships, and will get married someday. I assume you didn't know that. Secondly, you assume I advocate bastard children? How ridiculous could you possibly get. You go off on saying how you assume I hold a stance on children which says "screw them." I'm so glad you've come to this logical fact based conclusion. So basically, you traveled this path that started out by my talking about humans in their ID-only, society-less form, to TELLING ME WHAT I BELIEVE about children and my position of marriage, monogamy & choice-making based on how I feel at any given time. Way to make up nonsense. -------------------- |
Jul 20, 2007 - 10:02 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From The Netherlands Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Damnz, a lot of words here for something as basic/primitive/instinct as the copulation of a species
I don't care about the past or future (not in a long term anyway) of any girl. The time is now not tomorrow, for all you know you could be dead tomorrow. Live every day in joy and take things as they come. Thats my vision on life. -------------------- JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!
|
Jul 20, 2007 - 10:05 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
Hear-ye.
-------------------- |
Jul 20, 2007 - 10:39 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 8, '07 From Houston, Texas Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
These questions were sorta biased in the first place. Topic should be closed to avoid further arguments IMO.
-------------------- |
Jul 20, 2007 - 4:34 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
too much reading, but if i get it within the first couple dates, means that someone else could just as easily swoon on a bad week or something.
Not For Me aka, Not Toyota Reliable. . . This post has been edited by Consynx: Jul 20, 2007 - 4:34 PM -------------------- |
Jul 20, 2007 - 5:15 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Jul 20, 2007 - 9:52 AM) [snapback]580521[/snapback] You first off, assume I'm anti-marriage, anti-monogamy. I'm not, btw. I said they were unnatural for us, not wrong. I've been in long-term relationships, and will get married someday. I wouldn't have guessed when you proclaimed that marriage and monogamy were unnatural that your true feelings were that you actually planned on living by these concepts some day. It makes me wonder what the point of the statement was if not to be critical of the concepts?? Everything else in my post is a logical extension of the implication that persons should not practice monogamy or get married. If you didn't intend that message, you didn't communicate it well at all. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
Jul 21, 2007 - 1:21 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 28, '03 From Bloomington, IN Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Q: What do you think about women who sleep with you on the first or second date—does it impact whether you see her as a potential long-term girlfriend?
Yup. If she's that easy, she's usual no relationship material. Besides, I love the chase. Q: Are there cases where you do sleep with a woman early on, but are still open to a serious relationship with her—say, if the sex is great, or you two really hit it off during brunch the next day, or she's friends of friends? Brunch? People actually take their one-night-stands to breakfast? Hell, I thought I was being a gentlemen when I offer busfare. Q: In your experience, do you think women who make you wait for sex end up being better long-term partners? Yup. Once their's an emotional connection, sex is far better Q: What, in your mind, is an appropriate amount of time for two people to be dating before sleeping together? 2 weeks. Not kidding, but this is considering about 4-6 dates in that amount of time. That's when you really hit off tho and treat it like a potential relationship Q: If a woman does end up falling in bed with you pretty quickly, are there things she can do to pave the way toward a longer relationship? [/quote] Yeah. If she's has an attractive personality, we'll go out with you again. But we'll (guys) be expecting sex. Don't give it up, but you better be sure to make an impression on him to wanna chase you all over again -------------------- NASA/SCCA RX-7....currently under the knife
92 Civic hatch B16 - Sold 10th anniv RX-7 - RIP The Slow Celica - Sold...and then crushed crushed due to street racing. Quote from Seinfeild: George's Boss reading a magazine: "People magazine's most beautiful people. Oh and a Celica...nothin wrong with that!" |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 12:33 PM |