6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Increasing Gas Mileage With Taller Tires?
post Oct 24, 2008 - 8:27 AM
+Quote Post
D-Man



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 18, '08
From Houston
Currently Offline

Reputation: 7 (100%)




QUOTE (RickJamesBish @ Oct 23, 2008 - 5:57 PM) *
It always pisses me off when my car is rated 27/34 and I get 25 in the city. frown.gif
Buy sandals, apparently your foot is too heavy.


--------------------
QUOTE (presure2 @ Nov 6, 2010 - 6:16 AM)
Via FB: fcuking awsome!!! D-man FTW!

QUOTE (DEATH @ Nov 11, 2008 - 5:40 PM) *
Damn D-Man - most impressive.

QUOTE (99GT @ Nov 14, 2008 - 4:04 PM) *
D-Man's post should be a sticky

QUOTE (samir0189 @ Nov 4, 2008 - 10:50 AM) *
LOL, oh boy, you can always count on D-Man for ridiculously hilarious posts.
post Oct 24, 2008 - 8:28 AM
+Quote Post
playr158



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 22, '03
From NOVA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 16 (100%)




QUOTE (dgbldr @ Oct 23, 2008 - 8:31 PM) *
QUOTE (playr158 @ Oct 23, 2008 - 7:35 PM) *
wheels are not considered unsprung weight....you consider them rotational weight.
unsprung weight would only be the spring around your shock at a stand still


Incorrect. Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_weight


glad you linked the article i quoted thumbsup.gif

read entire threads b4 clicking reply wink.gif

This post has been edited by playr158: Oct 24, 2008 - 8:28 AM
post Oct 24, 2008 - 5:22 PM
+Quote Post
97GTinKC

Enthusiast
***
Joined Aug 31, '02
From KC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Wheel size alone can not be used as an indicator of weight. It all depends on the particular design, and there are better and worse ones out there. I would bet you can find 18" wheels with low profile tires that will weigh considerably less than the same overall height/width combo in a 15 or 16" wheel.

I am pretty sure you would gain fuel mileage with taller tires in a GT, (maybe not an ST) there is plenty of power available at highway speeds, I keep thinking I need another gear. But keep in mind- if you do change, it will throw your speedometer off so you may not be able to accurately calculate the actual gains.

My own mileage has dropped from a constant 29.9 mpg average to 27.5 ever since Missouri forced ethanol on us. This is what happens when you get government involved in technical/economic stuff. If I am adding 10% ethanol to the fuel and my mileage drops by 10%, I am burning the EXACT SAME amount of gasoline + the ethanol, so what have we gained in carbon emissions or oil usage reductions except to now drive up the price of food also?
post Oct 24, 2008 - 5:32 PM
+Quote Post
GriffGirl



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 7, '07
From Portland, Oregon
Currently Offline

Reputation: 67 (96%)




But it makes us tree hugging left wing liberals out here in Oregon so happy that you're spewing corn into the environment.


CORN not CARBON

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


--------------------
post Oct 24, 2008 - 6:07 PM
+Quote Post
joyworks

Enthusiast

Joined Oct 23, '07
From Dallas, TX
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Well said 97GTinKC, those are my feelings on the subject as well. Now, can anyone tell me how large of a wheel/tire diameter I can safely get into the wheel well of my Celica without any rubbing? It has not been lowered. I assume it would dependent on tire width. I will probably go with a 205 or 215 on a 16" rim. Any wider, and like people said earlier, it will negate any fuel savings.
post Oct 25, 2008 - 11:27 AM
+Quote Post
RickJamesBish

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 21, '08
From Naples, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (D-Man @ Oct 24, 2008 - 9:27 AM) *
QUOTE (RickJamesBish @ Oct 23, 2008 - 5:57 PM) *
It always pisses me off when my car is rated 27/34 and I get 25 in the city. frown.gif
Buy sandals, apparently your foot is too heavy.


rolleyes.gif

See my other thread. Don't all auto ST's get similar mileage?
post Oct 28, 2008 - 1:11 AM
+Quote Post
97GTinKC

Enthusiast
***
Joined Aug 31, '02
From KC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I'm going with 215/50-16 next time in place of the 205/50-16 on there now. Probably the BF Goodrich Traction TA again.
post Oct 28, 2008 - 1:32 AM
+Quote Post
alaNi



Enthusiast
*
Joined Nov 24, '06
From Kansas City
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




touche what octane do you guys use?
post Oct 28, 2008 - 6:10 AM
+Quote Post
playr158



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 22, '03
From NOVA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 16 (100%)




QUOTE (97GTinKC @ Oct 24, 2008 - 6:22 PM) *
Wheel size alone can not be used as an indicator of weight. It all depends on the particular design, and there are better and worse ones out there. I would bet you can find 18" wheels with low profile tires that will weigh considerably less than the same overall height/width combo in a 15 or 16" wheel.


this is very true. I can produce 18s that weight a LOT less than a set of 15s.....now tell me who on this site will put enough $ into their wheels that they'll buy $2000+ rims (alone) for some quality LTW wheels over your $1000 18" set of HP racing/AXIS ect.

yes i'm being bad and assuming the OP like 90% of this car culture will buy generic wheels.
post Oct 28, 2008 - 3:21 PM
+Quote Post
GriffGirl



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 7, '07
From Portland, Oregon
Currently Offline

Reputation: 67 (96%)




QUOTE (RickJamesBish @ Oct 25, 2008 - 9:27 AM) *
QUOTE (D-Man @ Oct 24, 2008 - 9:27 AM) *
QUOTE (RickJamesBish @ Oct 23, 2008 - 5:57 PM) *
It always pisses me off when my car is rated 27/34 and I get 25 in the city. frown.gif
Buy sandals, apparently your foot is too heavy.


rolleyes.gif

See my other thread. Don't all auto ST's get similar mileage?

Nope, apparently not because I average 30 mpg and I know there's not THAT much of a difference between auto/manual trans.


--------------------
post Oct 28, 2008 - 3:24 PM
+Quote Post
RickJamesBish

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 21, '08
From Naples, FL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Well, that's mad annoying...I'll just have to look into commonly fuel-sapping problems, since there's obviously something wrong.
post Oct 28, 2008 - 3:24 PM
+Quote Post
GriffGirl



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 7, '07
From Portland, Oregon
Currently Offline

Reputation: 67 (96%)




QUOTE (joyworks @ Oct 24, 2008 - 4:07 PM) *
Well said 97GTinKC, those are my feelings on the subject as well. Now, can anyone tell me how large of a wheel/tire diameter I can safely get into the wheel well of my Celica without any rubbing? It has not been lowered. I assume it would dependent on tire width. I will probably go with a 205 or 215 on a 16" rim. Any wider, and like people said earlier, it will negate any fuel savings.

215 is totally fine, and probably a better choice than 205. You can go up to 225 I believe w/out any concern of rubbing, and I don't believe either one will affect mileage. I'm running 215/40R17 on a manual ST and get 30 mpg on average, that's with stop and go and highway combined.


--------------------

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 22nd, 2024 - 7:59 PM