6G Celicas Forums

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

love that shot!!!!

Randy you'll appreciate that lens so much more when you go full frame. True 16mm is alot different. I have the 17-40 f4L and I love it so much more on the 5D.

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.



shot those yesterday during the sunset.

This post has been edited by Harold_Fastwaker: Feb 15, 2009 - 3:35 PM

my friends had their last show the other night... here's one before and after... lmk what you think.

shot with my xsi, sigma 15-30mm, 430ex II fired through opteka softbox

before

after


This post has been edited by stetsonaw: Feb 16, 2009 - 5:05 AM

Thanks 808.

Erik, I am looking forward to a ff, I am currently designing a rig to bolt directly
under the celi with a quick release for rolling shots, the 16-35 is wide,
but to get the results I want a FF is definatly in order.

Harold, I love #1, you are giving me motivation to try some different stuff.

Andy, I like the first one. The second is a cool effect, I just like the natural look better.

thanks randy! i like the first one better too, partial to the second one, he wanted one with a grainy effect, showed me a couple shots of what he was looking for, hoping he likes it.

Did a new photoshoot tonight.

trying out for the 10th member of slipknot? nice shots man!

i like the first ones but the last ones are too dark.

i would love to upload more pics but i need to give my computer a break. one of my fans had been on the fritz, and now it exploded. no i can only use my comp for a bit b4 i see the temps rise and i have to shut it off

Ok so the sellers of this condo granted me a $1,000 credit - someone talk me out of buying the 70-200 2.8 because when stuff like this happens I'm so easily swayed into temptation.

check out this pic DEATH took-

Experimenting with the "Focus"

Don't do it it is way over rated.

Ok I am a liar I love mine. As an all around lens I think it is the best.
The bokeh it produces is simply amazing. Just pretend you didn't get the credit
and the lens just showed up.

I really can't, I need take care of the condo first, then we'll see what I have left and if I can spare it.

What I am seeing is ALOT of f4s for sale - but hardly any 2.8s. So I could get an f4L IS cheaper because they are abundant, but I just want the 2.8 really.

Also: I fixed that first of the 3 photos the other day. I will have to post it here later.

This post has been edited by Supersprynt: Feb 20, 2009 - 4:32 PM

randy, saw you posting about this in the "post a pic of your 6gc" thread... i have lightroom 2, and i've tried picasa and ended up deleting it. picasa is free, thus a very slim editor. i've heard that the Gimp is really good, and freeware, i think. Picasa is good for autostuffs, brightness/contrast and sharpness, but you just have so much more in lightroom.

The f4 is so insanely sharp, however you do feel like a huge girl using it as it is like 2/3rds the size of the f2.8

so...i found a 5Dmk1 for a grand, thinking about selling my gripped xsi and tamron 18-270 so that i can buy it...

opinions?

This post has been edited by stetsonaw: Feb 21, 2009 - 3:08 AM

Check to see how many clicks it has. I bought mine for $1250 with a brand new shutter in it installed by Canon - effectively making it brand new.

Went to the local track today to get a little panning practice.
The last one I was just kinda goofing around at 1/30 it is a
lot trickier than I thought, fun though.







This post has been edited by 97lestyousay: Feb 22, 2009 - 4:29 PM