6G Celicas Forums

Alright I hope this clears up any misconceptions on what our cars was getting. Some of the people on this board have gotten outrageous fuel economy, which in turn has discourage other members into believing how bad of a condition their car is in.

First off, fuel economy has many factors that effect it. Some of these factors are age, health, weight, how you drive, model (to some degree) So please take these things into consideration when reading this chart.

I hope this information has been of some used.

*This information was taken from Toyota's specification sheet. I was able to duplicate it with rights, while I was a part-time parts representative.*

1994 Celica:
----------------------------- (L/100KMS) --- (MPG) ----
ENG.. | TRANSMISSION | CITY - HWY | CITY - HWY
7AFE | MANUAL .......|_ 8.7 - 6.4 |_ 32 - 44
7AFE | AUTOMATIC ..|_ 9.2 - 6.7 |_ 31 - 42
5SFE | MANUAL .......| 10.3 - 7.4 |_ 27 - 38
5SFE | AUTOMATIC ..| 10.4 - 7.3 |_ 27 - 39

1995 Celica:
----------------------------- (L/100KMS) --- (MPG) ----
ENG.. | TRANSMISSION | CITY - HWY | CITY - HWY
7AFE | MANUAL .......|_ 8.1 - 6.4 |_ 35 - 44
7AFE | AUTOMATIC ..|_ 8.8 - 6.5 |_ 32 - 43
5SFE | MANUAL .......| 10.5 - 7.6 |_ 27 - 37
5SFE | AUTOMATIC ..| 10.4 - 7.3 |_ 27 - 39

1996 Celica:
----------------------------- (L/100KMS) --- (MPG) ----
ENG.. | TRANSMISSION | CITY - HWY | CITY - HWY
7AFE | MANUAL .......|_ 8.1 - 6.4 |_ 35 - 44
7AFE | AUTOMATIC ..|_ 8.8 - 6.5 |_ 32 - 43
5SFE | MANUAL .......| 10.6 - 7.6 |_ 27 - 37
5SFE | AUTOMATIC ..| 10.8 - 7.5 |_ 26 - 38

1997 Celica - 1998 Celica:
----------------------------- (L/100KMS) --- (MPG) ----
ENG.. | TRANSMISSION | CITY - HWY | CITY - HWY
5SFE | MANUAL .......| 10.6 - 7.6 |_ 27 - 37
5SFE | AUTOMATIC ..| 10.8 - 7.5 |_ 26 - 38

1999 Celica:
----------------------------- (L/100KMS) --- (MPG) ----
ENG.. | TRANSMISSION | CITY - HWY | CITY - HWY
5SFE | MANUAL .......| 10.8 - 7.6 |_ 26 - 37
5SFE | AUTOMATIC ..| 10.6 - 7.7 |_ 27 - 37

Its not my typical DIY but its pretty damn useful. aha

- my celica was getting 12.8L/100kms (I had a half a dime size hole in the front pipe) it was recently replaced with another used pipe. I am now getting 10.8L/100kms mixed of highway and city driving + lead foot aha LESSON TO LEARN: FIX YOUR EXHAUST LEAKS!!!

This post has been edited by vile_v: Apr 17, 2010 - 6:42 PM

nice info! turns out that my car actually gets numbers around there. we get spanked by integras with the standard b18b with fuel economy and our cars arent any faster =(

I only ever get as bad as 10.5 If I use ****ty fuel and floor it everywhere if I use good fuel and drive normal I get 9 litres per 100km.

great stuff, will see if we can get the 3S-GE/BEAMS and the 3S-GTE fuel usage. and should be added to the sticky section for future reference

i usually do 600 km with 47l, so an average of 7.8l per 100 km. i drive half city/half highway everyday.
my record was a little over 800km with 55l, 3people inside, trunck loaded to max, so an average of 6.8 l/km.

This post has been edited by zoik: Apr 17, 2010 - 6:10 AM

My old 95 Celica ST got around 18MPG =_=

WAIT!!

You mean to tell me a 94-7afe can achieve 44mpg, while


quote via WIKI.com



wow- how great it is that technology has advanced so far here in the us. 17 years LATER the USDM cannot produce a damn vehicle that can... oh gawd damnit man... I'm moving outta america. I"M NOT WITH THE REST OF THESE GUYS!!

SOMEONE TELL AMERICAN COMPANYS TO PAY ATTENTION!!

wow...40+ is bull****,i got 39,ONCE and that was 55,cruise control,no ac,no passing,NOTHING..


(nice pic of ferdi d-man)

This post has been edited by CelicaST_CALI: Apr 20, 2010 - 1:32 AM

The 2011 mustang gets 19/31. Most fuel efficient 300 horsepower car ever produced. You fail D-man!

I only get 28mpg with my '95 ST! WTF

How do you guys measure this?

fill your tank then drive 100 miles then fill your tank again , note the amount of gallons you had to refill with, then divide miles by gallons and it will tell you your mpg

This post has been edited by b22ri22an: Jun 28, 2010 - 7:13 AM

anddd the 2011 v6 mustang weighs 3580lbs with a 180 pound driver..and the celica ST is like what, 2500lbs? come on now are we really going to argue this?
esp when my old 94 mustang 3.8 v6 got 16 mpg city with a 10 gallon gas tank.. ya 160 miles to a tank, which is y i drive a celica now lol.

oh and the 2011 v6 mustang runs 14.33 on the 1/4 mile with 240 stock rwhp.. not to bad out of a 3500 pound stock v6 that has 19/31 mpg at 305 hp im a mustang guy by heart

Heres the thing you have to consider "thruway" mpg. In my case highway is 55 and thruway (depending where you are) is 65. If I drive at highway speeds I can get over 40mpg or around that, and if I drive at thruway speeds I can get high 30's. with a small amount of city driving, along with going up and down mountains, added with going about 70mph I was able to travel 300+ miles on about 9-10 gallons of fuel, so I avg. a little more than 30mpg. Anyone has similar results?

I have gotten up to 600 miles on a tank with around 200K miles on my car, that's an average of 37.3 MPG

NYp8tBaller07, I get about the same mileage as you when I travel from Midcoast Area in Maine to Boston for school on the interstate

i always get 31mpg hwy. I always get around 430ish miles until the fuel light comes on.

my car has 213k miles now.

I get like 320 miles until my gas light comes on. Then when I fill it it takes about 12 gallons.

320/12 = 26.7

That's about what I get during the summer but right now I'm below 300...damn cold weather.

i got about 450 out of a tank, thats with a 97 automatic. that spreadsheet you got, i would post that everywhere i could!

Holy hell, I'm getting the ST version