6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Oh yes, I popped a few pills for my math final...
post Dec 13, 2005 - 2:13 PM
+Quote Post
Terzin1



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 19, '05
From Indianapolis
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I dont think you guys have any idea about what i think of math. I dont hate it, i am just not good at it and i think i know the reason. It is not that I cannot remember the formulas or the equations or even the derivatives, it is that I think that I cannot understand why math was created the way it was. It was someone who decided that we should count by 1's. Why not 1/2's or anything?
Heres what confuses me. (this is not a math problem so bear with me) If you have a line that is 4 inches, a physical line that you can see, it is possible to divide that line into 3, 100 percent equal, parts. but if you have a line that equals 4, meaning you cannot see the line but it is represented as 4, then there is no way to divide that into 3 equal parts. the number comes out to 1.33333333333333....... and on forever. If it goes on forever then there is no end. If that is the case than how can you divide a line into three separate parts just fine? Theoretically, i think there should be an end and thus this is why i think math is flawed. Try and take that 3.9999999... x 3 again and you will see that it will not equal the whole number 4. There must be a problem.


--------------------
For the best designs and screen printing.
WE DON'T PRINT UGLY.
www.TERZink.com
post Dec 13, 2005 - 2:16 PM
+Quote Post
jgreening

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 17, '04
From Illinois
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




3.9999999...(ad infinitum) = 4.


--------------------
QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback]

i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this.
post Dec 13, 2005 - 2:47 PM
+Quote Post
CelicaQT



Enthusiast
***
Joined Sep 29, '02
From Sterling Heights, Michigan
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




haha did those pills wear off yet? biggrin.gif
Yeah I hate Calculus. I have one last Calc Class (Differential Equations) to go and then I'm done with that portion of math. There's just too much info. to know. I suck at it.
post Dec 13, 2005 - 3:00 PM
+Quote Post
WannabeGT4



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 10, '03
From Wichita, KS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




1.3333333333333333333... is 1 and 1/3. It's just a different way to represent the same number. If it makes your head hurt less just associate any repeating number with a fraction. Just because a 4 inch line cut in thirds can't be represented by tenths doesn't mean that it can't happen.


--------------------
IPB Image
Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete...
post Dec 13, 2005 - 3:44 PM
+Quote Post
Terzin1



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 19, '05
From Indianapolis
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




i dont think you understand tho. a piece of that number 4 is getting lost somewhere. 1.33333333333333 x 3 is not 4; its 3.99999999999. your calculator is rounding the infinite decimal into a fraction but in reality, it should not be a fraction. where did that .0000000000001, or however small a piece it is. where did that go?


--------------------
For the best designs and screen printing.
WE DON'T PRINT UGLY.
www.TERZink.com
post Dec 13, 2005 - 4:03 PM
+Quote Post
ILuvMyCelica95



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 16, '02
From New York
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




I hate math too. I really suck at it. I still add on my fingers all the time. lol.

and i'm already lost..



This post has been edited by ILuvMyCelica95: Dec 13, 2005 - 8:53 PM


--------------------
post Dec 13, 2005 - 4:04 PM
+Quote Post
WannabeGT4



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 10, '03
From Wichita, KS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




There is no way to reprent 1/3 of something by using 10ths. It's that simple. Like I said if you're trying to make sense of it just use fractions. .1 is 1/10th .3 is 3/10ths etc.

Here is an example for you... We in America measure things using 16ths of an inch and 12 inches to a foot. When you try to convert these to metric you get seemingly random numbers and sometimes infinite sequential numbers... Does that make more sense to you?

This post has been edited by WannabeGT4: Dec 13, 2005 - 5:03 PM


--------------------
IPB Image
Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete...
post Dec 13, 2005 - 4:20 PM
+Quote Post
orvillescelica



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 1, '02
From Seattle, WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(Terzin1 @ Dec 13, 2005 - 12:44 PM) [snapback]366773[/snapback]

i dont think you understand tho. a piece of that number 4 is getting lost somewhere. 1.33333333333333 x 3 is not 4; its 3.99999999999. your calculator is rounding the infinite decimal into a fraction but in reality, it should not be a fraction. where did that .0000000000001, or however small a piece it is. where did that go?


One problem is the line itself. If you have a physical line that you yourself created, or that an andvanced line making machine created, it is most impossible for that line to be EXACTLY 4 units. In today standards, a tolerence of +-0.0001 when making something is extrodinary. So in reality, your line is 4+- 0.0001 which is much much more than the 1E-15 you are worrying about. And when you cut it into 3 pieces, you are not going to get three equal pieces, you are going to get one that is 1.34 and another that is 1.32, etc... So really, you cant compare reality to math. Because it is actually the opposite from what you said, Math is perfect and reality is flawed.


--------------------

Its Orville's Celica, i just drive it...
post Dec 13, 2005 - 4:33 PM
+Quote Post
jgreening

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 17, '04
From Illinois
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(Terzin1 @ Dec 13, 2005 - 2:44 PM) [snapback]366773[/snapback]

i dont think you understand tho. a piece of that number 4 is getting lost somewhere. 1.33333333333333 x 3 is not 4; its 3.99999999999. your calculator is rounding the infinite decimal into a fraction but in reality, it should not be a fraction. where did that .0000000000001, or however small a piece it is. where did that go?


I didn't use a calculator. This is math fact. When we say that the fraction 1/3 is represented by 0.33333333 (ad infinitum), that means the "3"s go on FOREVER. IT NEVER STOPS. Therefore 3 x 1/3 = 0.999999999 (ad infinitum). The "9"s never stop either. Since we know that 3 x 1/3 = 1 and we know that 1/3 = 0.333333333 (ad infinitum), and that 0.333333333 (ad infinitum) x 3 = 0.99999999999 (ad infinitum), then, by deductive logic, we know that:

1 = 0.99999999999 (adinfintum)


--------------------
QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback]

i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this.
post Dec 13, 2005 - 4:51 PM
+Quote Post
celicaST



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 23, '05
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




i take it you havnt taken calculus yet. the concept of infinity is a tough one to grasp and work with in mathematics. it caused problems centuries ago, and it continues to do so in modern physics. your comment though about counting by 1/2's or something other than units, well i guess you can count like that if you really want to, people might look at you strange though... if your really interested, go pick up a book on number theory, not an easy read wink.gif.

celicaQT, dont worry about diff eq, not that bad after calc 3. when you hit nonlinear diff eq's though... not fun!


--------------------
IPB Image

I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside.
post Dec 13, 2005 - 5:25 PM
+Quote Post
FSX_Celica94GT



Enthusiast
***
Joined Nov 26, '03
From Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




its because 100 can not be divded by 3 perfectly. The thirds can be represented in fractions, but not decimals.


--------------------
It's not just about getting from point A to point B anymore....

user posted image
post Dec 13, 2005 - 5:31 PM
+Quote Post
Celica_Fan



Enthusiast
***
Joined Sep 19, '05
From Auckland New Zealand
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Nerds lol just kidding I ain't good at maths. Maths sucks I was better at automotive.


--------------------
Wanted White Or Silver Toyota Celica SS2 1998 Auto Sunroof, ABS 200 hp JDM Model

Random Stupid Question Asked To Me On allexperts.com Under Category Toyota: could 100% japan toyotas, be stolen by a professional thief, or anyone else.
post Dec 13, 2005 - 6:07 PM
+Quote Post
Terzin1



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 19, '05
From Indianapolis
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I can't explain this phenomenon and I am in M119 business calc. by the way. On a side note, I just got a 57% on my final, haha. I am terrible at math but I like to draw things to conclusions. Why is it that division is the only part of math that cannot be always used in examples for physical things? If you take a whole number like 2 and add another to it like 5 you get 7. You can say you had 2 apples and found 5 more for a total of 7 apples. You could do the same with subtraction and get rid of some apples. You could multiply the number of apples you have even. Addition, subtraction, and multiplication can all be used for physical and theoretical problems without ending up with decimals and especially decimals with no end. The only way that you get a decimal that never ends is by division, or from what I can tell. What is wrong with division? perhaps it is our number system and the fact that you cannot divide using a ten scale. Could it be that there is another number out there that would solve this problem? I just think that it is a problem that if solved, could explain alot of things. By the way, I would totally agree that math is perfect, therefore this problem should not exist.


This post has been edited by Terzin1: Dec 13, 2005 - 6:09 PM


--------------------
For the best designs and screen printing.
WE DON'T PRINT UGLY.
www.TERZink.com
post Dec 13, 2005 - 9:41 PM
+Quote Post
Shigexile



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 30, '03
From IL
Currently Offline

Reputation: 15 (100%)




Ahahahaaha


--------------------
post Dec 13, 2005 - 9:45 PM
+Quote Post
Jdog1385



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 14, '03
From Long Island, N.Y.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




i went up to calc 2 for engineers/architects...thank god i dont have to do anymore
post Dec 13, 2005 - 11:00 PM
+Quote Post
dlx742



Enthusiast
**
Joined Oct 10, '05
From San Diego
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




I love differentiating

lol jk

i have a solid "A" grade in calculus Ap right now, im stoked
post Dec 13, 2005 - 11:27 PM
+Quote Post
RocketScott



Enthusiast
***
Joined Nov 21, '05
From Tacoma, WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 7 (100%)




QUOTE(Terzin1 @ Dec 13, 2005 - 3:07 PM) [snapback]366812[/snapback]

..... By the way, I would totally agree that math is perfect, therefore this problem should not exist.



What problem? I see no problem. It's our understanding that is flawed. What you must understand when doing complex problems like this is the number of significant figures to us and that the numbers are only reprsentative of what you are trying to solve. You can divide a number by another and take it to the infinite decimal point but why? I'm a carpenter, I build large houses. The smallest unit of measure I use is 1/8 inch, maybe I'll add a little or subtract a little. There's no need for 32nds or 64ths for what I do, nobody will notice. When I was college that would not have worked. Whole different ball of wax. Running chemical reactions on a small scale requires so much more precision. Had to take numbers out to a bunch of decimal points.

Try to just focus on the problems you have in front of you. Simpify what you can before trying to calculate. Leave numbers as fractions as long as you can, this will help with simplifying.
post Dec 14, 2005 - 1:54 AM
+Quote Post
soulshadow



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 18, '05
From Lincoln, Ar
Currently Offline

Reputation: 7 (100%)




yeah math is hard, but a 2nd round at calc. will make u pass with an B or better. Just make sure to pop lots of pills during finals. I did that and I passed with a B+ on my 2nd try at calc. 1.
post Dec 14, 2005 - 6:08 AM
+Quote Post
presure2



Moderator
*****
Joined Oct 1, '02
From fall river, ma
Currently Offline

Reputation: 13 (100%)




this topic makes my head hurt! =)


--------------------
Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)

13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered
post Dec 14, 2005 - 6:25 AM
+Quote Post
Dr_Tweak



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 31, '04
From Summerville, SC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




Exactly what pills are you supposed to pop?


--------------------
-Dr Tweak, 6GC's resident engine swap wiring expert extraordinaire
Click here to see my swaps
drtweak@phoenixtuning.com


2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: January 11th, 2025 - 11:11 PM