Gt v.s Z24 |
Gt v.s Z24 |
Jul 9, 2006 - 10:53 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 6, '06 Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
haha
so my friend the other day said he wants to race me. he drives a CAVALIER z24.....pshhh and has a intake and a huge fart cannon on it, and says he can beat me. supposedly its packing 150 hp stock, and then he claims hes got about 160 or so now. i think i can beat him....simply cause....its a cavalier....come on now...lol so i was jsut looking for waht you guys think. -------------------- KB |
Jul 9, 2006 - 10:55 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 18, '05 From BANNED Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
as much as I hate to say it it would prolly beat you. But it would be one of the slowest races ever.
-------------------- BANNED!
|
Jul 9, 2006 - 10:59 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 6, '06 Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
yea...maybe.....i dunno. ive drove around in it, and it dosent pick up all that quick. teh celica picks up much faster, or it seems that way. i dunno, im gonan race him once my intake and exhaust come in
-------------------- KB |
Jul 9, 2006 - 11:25 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 6, '06 From Willington, CT Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
My friend has a cavalier z24 too and is really headstrong bout his too... id say u can beat it... cuz they really are nothing special. just race him liek 3 times, his engine will blow at somepoint in there and u automatically win... stupid domestics. hes had to put so much repair dollars into his cavalier... its awfull.
-------------------- Mini Supra... in need of mini boost.
|
Jul 9, 2006 - 11:26 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 29, '03 From 캘리포니아 Currently Offline Reputation: 23 (100%) |
a z24 beat me, they are just a little faster
-------------------- |
Jul 9, 2006 - 11:32 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From The Netherlands Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Looking at the specs.
Cavalier weight = 2800 LBS Celica weight 2550 LBS Cavalier 0-60 = 9.1 sec Celica 0-60 = 8.4 sec Even with those 10 extra hp (with an intake?!) statistics are on your side! -------------------- JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!
|
Jul 9, 2006 - 1:16 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 5, '03 From South TX. Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
Kadett, here are the real specs for U.S. lol
Z24 0-60 8.1 sec US GT Celica=11sec while they are only off the top of my head, i know for a fact 1996-1999 z24's run low 16 sec 1/4th and the 00-02 runs mid 15's stock Celica GT's run 17.8-16.6 ish if your lucky....how sad |
Jul 9, 2006 - 1:59 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 5, '06 From Hayward,CA Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
QUOTE(95celgt @ Jul 9, 2006 - 1:16 PM) [snapback]453711[/snapback] Kadett, here are the real specs for U.S. lol Z24 0-60 8.1 sec US GT Celica=11sec while they are only off the top of my head, i know for a fact 1996-1999 z24's run low 16 sec 1/4th and the 00-02 runs mid 15's stock Celica GT's run 17.8-16.6 ish if your lucky....how sad where did you get 11 seconds? US gt is 8.4 and the ST is 9.9. maybe 11 seconds is an automatic ST or something. |
Jul 9, 2006 - 2:10 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 12, '06 From Fresno CA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
i''ve heard z24 for pretty quick are they dule over head cam?
-------------------- |
Jul 9, 2006 - 3:35 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
for the record, street racing threads are frowned apon here.
DO NOT post your street racing stories. -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Jul 9, 2006 - 3:51 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 5, '03 From South TX. Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
im talking track times here manny:)
when i ran the 5s at the track (auto as well) it took like 10 sec to get to 60, and at 17.5 1/4th it reached 77 mph. |
Jul 9, 2006 - 6:39 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 1, '03 From WV Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I use to have a Z24 that I raced dirt track with. Those things are nothing to laugh at. It was gutted and everything, but those can be really fast if they are just kept in good condition. The problem is, most just buy them and beat them to death and don't fix what needs fixed. I had a 3.1 though, and they might have been more powerful than the newer 2.4 and newier yet 2.2's. Oh, they handle pretty sloppy in my opion, so anything besides a drag is kind of a losing battle unless you upgrade the suspension. That isn't hard to do in those things though. Cheap parts. They make a nice turbo kit for those 3.1s, and it came on the old special edition Grandprix's. My mom had one of those. Either way, a good match for a Celica in a drag.
-------------------- Live Free, Be Happy
|
Jul 10, 2006 - 12:42 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 29, '03 From 캘리포니아 Currently Offline Reputation: 23 (100%) |
yeah my race was on a track as well, it was my best time of 16.8 in the 1/4 but the cavy still beat me
-------------------- |
Jul 10, 2006 - 12:24 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From The Netherlands Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I googled/yahooed and got the info of a 1996 cavalier. So maybe thats why playr158 has different times. But 11 seconds for a GT Celica even if its a 2.2 5S-FE with auto trans. I just cant believe that.
-------------------- JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 13th, 2025 - 9:43 AM |