![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Sep 4, '03 From Twin Cities MN Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
Hopefully someone with knowlege about suspentions and superstruts can help answer this, so here goes-
So the 6th gen, along with various other toyotas from the time had what was called a "super strut" suspention setup in the high performance models. Now, from what i've always understood is that they help to give greater traction and handling (in ideal situations), but my question arises because of this. The 7th gen. Celica has wishbone suspention, correct? I've always understood wishbones to be superior for performance applications in regards to handling and grip, in general. So why is it that in the 7th gen, the SS-I and SS-II's (JDM mind you) carried the wishbone setup, and then the top models were the SS-II Super Strut cars? How exactly does the superstrut surpass (or differ) from the "more basic" wishbone models? I'd just like some insight from someone who knows what they are talking about, because this flies in the face from what i've always thought I understood... -------------------- Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06
Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driver Car #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03 |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(saleeka @ Dec 15, 2006 - 5:15 AM) [snapback]510599[/snapback] Hopefully someone with knowlege about suspentions and superstruts can help answer this, so here goes- So the 6th gen, along with various other toyotas from the time had what was called a "super strut" suspention setup in the high performance models. Now, from what i've always understood is that they help to give greater traction and handling (in ideal situations), but my question arises because of this. The 7th gen. Celica has wishbone suspention, correct? I've always understood wishbones to be superior for performance applications in regards to handling and grip, in general. So why is it that in the 7th gen, the SS-I and SS-II's (JDM mind you) carried the wishbone setup, and then the top models were the SS-II Super Strut cars? How exactly does the superstrut surpass (or differ) from the "more basic" wishbone models? I'd just like some insight from someone who knows what they are talking about, because this flies in the face from what i've always thought I understood... Easy answer... the 6th gens (SSI and SSII non Super Strut models) did NOT come with wishbone suspension, per-say double wishbones. They came simply with a lower control arm, which can be considered a single wishbone... however because it mounts to a macphearson strut, it changes things. Double wishbone suspension is ideal from a tuning standpoint, but because of the size double wishbone design, it's not cost effective for relatively low cost sport compacts such as Celicas to have front and rear double wishbone suspension. The 7th gen did have double wishbone rear suspension... but only came with macphearson struts on the fronts. Why? Super Struts, although can potentially perform better... had other significant drawbacks. Difficult to tune and maintain, and expensive. This post has been edited by Kwanza26: Dec 15, 2006 - 12:35 AM -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 28, '02 From Europe, Lithuania Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
Well i will try to explain form what i understand is the biggest difference between Mac and SS and what are advatiges of having SS suspension. I drawed a little sketch with MS Paint (it sucks big time
![]() ![]() First on the left is Mac suspensions. As it only usses 2 moving points - the biggest loss is the traction when the suspension is moving. Basicly wheel isnt moving in a straight line when it is going up and down - so this means tire has less contact with the ground / less surface for gripping/handling. On the right SS suspension, as it has 5 joints, and it is set up the way to let the wheel move on the 90' vertical line - tire is always on its full profile on the ground. But the biggest disapointment of this suspension is what even if one joint will go out - and you will have terible knocking in the suspension - witch feels on whole car even on a little bumps... + you will need to shangle whole arm witch costs Stupidly inormal $... With the SS the ride quality is more confy, and gives you more secured handling. But i would go back to Mac all the way if i had to chose... Life has proven what more simple things make your life easyer ![]() ![]() -------------------- Ex celica owner - just a guy from other side of the pond...
Full custom Projects from restoration to performance builds <<<<<< DCw / JDMart >>>>>>> |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 19, '05 From Nebraska Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) ![]() |
nice drawing romas! Despite what you've said, I still want to own a car with SS one day to compare and contrast.
-------------------- Teh Celica sleeps for Winter '06. Suspension overhaul begins........
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 29, '06 From Hull, UK Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
well done with the drawing mate, couldn't explain it better myself.
As far as reliability goes, I have had no problems with mine other than the fig 8 piece has gone on both sides. Which for a 100,000 mile 12 year old car isn't bad to have to change those once in 4 years of ownership (I don't think so anyway.) We can get them for about £80 each. Think you're getting ripped off having to pay $500+, you don't need to change the full arm, the fig 8 can be changed seperately. Also, the common diagnosis of the fig 8 needing replacing (that I found anyway) is that the car pulls to one side or the other. Accelerate and steer in a straight line then let off the accelerator and the car will go sideways slightly, accelerate and it will pull itself straight again. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
dual wishbone vs ss???
-------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 28, '02 From Europe, Lithuania Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(vsideboy @ Dec 15, 2006 - 12:17 AM) [snapback]510636[/snapback] well done with the drawing mate, couldn't explain it better myself. As far as reliability goes, I have had no problems with mine other than the fig 8 piece has gone on both sides. Which for a 100,000 mile 12 year old car isn't bad to have to change those once in 4 years of ownership (I don't think so anyway.) We can get them for about £80 each. Think you're getting ripped off having to pay $500+, you don't need to change the full arm, the fig 8 can be changed seperately. Also, the common diagnosis of the fig 8 needing replacing (that I found anyway) is that the car pulls to one side or the other. Accelerate and steer in a straight line then let off the accelerator and the car will go sideways slightly, accelerate and it will pull itself straight again. I made a mistake writing what 8 figure cost 500$ ![]() But still my SSIII has 86k km its like 50K miles - and both 8 figures are out - so im going to try and restore them in a company who does this - but if they will go out quick - im gonna ditch the superstrut and go back to Mac. -------------------- Ex celica owner - just a guy from other side of the pond...
Full custom Projects from restoration to performance builds <<<<<< DCw / JDMart >>>>>>> |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 22nd, 2025 - 3:12 PM |