 ST 1/4 mile times. |
  |
 Dec 7, 2003 - 10:19 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 3, '03 From Oklahoma Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
Lets see them. I think if I ran mine I might be in the 18's.
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 12:07 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I THINK I heard somewhere if you CAI and Underdrive pully a ST with a super afc, then you get low 16's.
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 12:08 AM
|
|
 Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
I ran a 17.7 with a dying clutch and bad compression, from partially-fried piston rings I believe.
-------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 1:34 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Mar 6, '03 From South Central Los Angeles and Long Beach, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
A friend of mine "says" they ran somewhere in the 15's. With a BONE STOCK ST! I've driving the car and raced against it (before the swap) and YES it was pretty quick.
Although the way they timed it wasnt accurate at all. It was with a stopwatch on the street. So you guys tell me what you think about that? Is it really possible? David |
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 1:55 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Sep 4, '02 From South Carolina Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
If they had a running start
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 1:12 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Apr 8, '03 From NorCal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I would guesstimate mid-high 16's for myself... and no... there's no way in hell an ST can run 15's w/o turbo, nitrious, etc...
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 2:08 PM
|
|
||
 Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i agree -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
||
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 2:50 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '03 From Atlanta from millville nj org. Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
my best time in my car was a 14.9 wit a few bolt ons. but it is very torque. but my celica is a gt.
--------------------  |
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 3:35 PM
|
|
||
|
Administrator Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
What modifications do you have, and what was your trap speed? 14.9 is really fast for a GT. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
||
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 5:20 PM
|
|
||
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 8, '03 From NorCal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Trust me... you don't run 14.9... unless you're squeezin or turboed... |
||
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 7:10 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Aug 29, '02 From San Diego CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i ran a 10.3 at the 1/8th mile i always wanted to see what i run on a quarter mile.
but then again i dont want to get disappointed so i stick with Auto X |
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 10:10 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i went to the track a few weeks ago.
at the time i had my old turbo on the car, and it was fuxored. at the track it made no boost until halfway through 2nd and barely held 4psi the car was running like crap and pulled a 16.7 @80mph with my new turbo, peak boost of 8.5psi at 4krpm in first(5psi by 3k) and a spike to 10.5 in the shift to 2nd then it holds at 8.5psi all the way to 4th. should make a huge difference next time i go to the track. -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 10:25 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 3, '03 From Oklahoma Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
What happened to my other reply? Did I say something bad?
|
|
Dec 8, 2003 - 10:36 PM
|
|
||||
 Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Maryland Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
Agreed. My best is 16.4 missing 2nd -Bryan- -------------------- Member of Team 5sfTe
|
||||
|
Dec 9, 2003 - 1:26 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Nov 15, '02 From Corona & Vallejo, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
My fastest ever with my former ST (back when I had the 7A) was 16.545. And that's with intake, exhaust, and factory 14" wheels. Once I got my 16's installed, I started running 16.9 to 17.2.
Here's the proof of the mediocre feat:  MY ADVICE... if you want faster time at the tracks... put your 14's back on... It won't look as nice (and hey, it's not a car show), but it'll get you faster times... This post has been edited by kuya1284: Dec 9, 2003 - 1:29 AM |
|
Dec 9, 2003 - 2:31 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Oct 28, '02 From Europe, Lithuania Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
My best time was 16.32 including reaction time, and i was on my '16.. So i think it is very good for ST...
-------------------- Ex celica owner - just a guy from other side of the pond...
Full custom Projects from restoration to performance builds <<<<<< DCw / JDMart >>>>>>> |
|
Dec 9, 2003 - 9:28 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
Go away mr. Euro hood wing
|
|
Dec 10, 2003 - 4:27 AM
|
|
||
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 28, '02 From Europe, Lithuania Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
HE HE LOL  ok,im out...... no more replays from my side.....
-------------------- Ex celica owner - just a guy from other side of the pond...
Full custom Projects from restoration to performance builds <<<<<< DCw / JDMart >>>>>>> |
||
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 3:54 PM |