what does a stock gt run in the 1/4 Options

[trdcelicagt]

i have a 1995 gt with cat back on it what would it run in the 1/4

[Benevolence]

Probably in the 16's maybe low if its a good driver and a 5 speed.

[1bwilson]

Good luck finding low 16's. A 6th gen is susposed to be there but all I ever hear from people who have actualy raced is 17.0-high 16's for a stock celi. That is for a 5 speed too. I ran my fastest this year after my tranny swap. 16.4... I think but thats with all the **** I have and a new ACT clutch. I know the celi can hit 15's n/a but you have to be highly modded.

-Bryan-

[PaulGT]

My celica ran a 16.3 stock with only a k&n box drop in filter...i wanna take it back this spring now that i have an exhaust and an intake i plan on gettin in the high 15's my goal with my car is to run in the mid 14's but thats a long shot...hey man go for it and good luck the quarter mile is a fun track to run...not as fun as auto cross but still an adrenalen rush!

[Consynx]

how much slower should an auto be than a manual anyway?

[trdcelicagt]

i live in colorado and we are above sea level so what would i run here

[95STCelica]

i've got a cat back and a CAI...so what? High 16s with a little practice driving...it's a 5 speed..

[PaulGT]

he said GT not ST dude!

[capncrakhed]

few weeks ago i ran a 16.54 i have a GT with no engine mods, and its an automatic

i think it matters on the driver

[FallenHero]

Well, I have an Auto ST with intake and exhaust, so I guess mine would run about the same. Does that sound good to you more knwing guys out there?

[BlackandTAN]

my stock GT celica rna 1/4 time of 16.50

[zigy]

Manual Celica GT - QuarterMile = 16.4

Automatic Celica GT - QuarterMile = 16.8

Manual Celica ST - QuarterMile = 16.9

Automatic Celica ST - QuarterMile = 17.2

[capncrakhed]

QUOTE (zigy @ Mar 12, 2003 - 12:04 AM)

Manual Celica GT - QuarterMile = 16.4 Automatic Celica GT - QuarterMile = 16.8 Manual Celica ST - QuarterMile = 16.9 Automatic Celica ST - QuarterMile = 17.2

where'd you get them from?

[zigy]

QUOTE (capncrakhed @ Mar 12, 2003 - 10:19 PM)

[QUOTE=zigy,Mar 12, 2003 - 12:04 AM] where'd you get them from?

One of my "Honda forums", http://www.hondaswap.com .

I can personaly vouch for:

Celica ST Automatic

and

Celica GT Manual

[TRDracerGT]

I have a 95 gt 5 speed and i ran a 16.1 with Injen Intake and 16'' wheels. that was about a year ago so its probably running alot slower now.

[zigy]

QUOTE (capncrakhed @ Feb 17, 2003 - 8:52 PM)

few weeks ago i ran a 16.54 i have a GT with no engine mods, and its an automatic i think it matters on the driver

MATTERS ON THE DRIVER???????


WHAT !!!!! the car is a freaken AUTOMATIC, what the heck does automatic have

to do with a driver, or what does driver have to do with automatic ???????????????

[breeze]

QUOTE (zigy @ Mar 13, 2003 - 12:05 PM)

QUOTE (capncrakhed @ Feb 17, 2003 - 8:52 PM) few weeks ago i ran a 16.54  i have a GT with no engine mods, and its an automatic i think it matters on the driver MATTERS ON THE DRIVER??????? WHAT !!!!! the car is a freaken AUTOMATIC, what the heck does automatic have to do with a driver, or what does driver have to do with automatic ???????????????

whether the driver can properly launch the auto. small difference, but enough to shave time off.

[capncrakhed]

took the words right outta my mouth........no matter what type of transmission you have...it's still up to you to react to the start tree...thats why i never believe any type of generalization on car times....like i said.....it depends on the driver

[JiGGa]

Driver's Weight? hahaha