I think to much some slap me, 3s < 5s |
I think to much some slap me, 3s < 5s |
Jun 17, 2005 - 2:32 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 4, '02 From Hecho en la Republica Dominicana/Living in NJ Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok so toyota has the 3s block which is a great one we all know this .. but see as its te 3th make of the S block wouldn't the 5S be a better block ? ... why would toyota make the 5 th version of the block weeker then that of the 3rd? .... and while at it why would the internals be weaker ? it just would make any senne for toyota to not move up .. and keep there "toyota is for ever " thing going ... and then why would they put the 5S in so many cars and in the one that they sell the most ? unless it can take abuse like a pro ? then i'm thinkin my eingine has 221,XXX K miles on it and she is still strong ... and doesn't burn oil ? now what i want to try is doing is fine and camary with the SS and boost it the right way and see how much before it will blow up ....
-------------------- |
Jun 17, 2005 - 3:43 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 8, '04 From Newport, RI Currently Offline Reputation: 63 (99%) |
-------------------- |
Jun 17, 2005 - 7:33 AM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
mac, some of your posts are SO hard to understand man!! ...if your trying to say the 5s block is better then the 3s...sorry, i think your wrong man..lol
-------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Jun 17, 2005 - 8:08 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 4, '02 From Hecho en la Republica Dominicana/Living in NJ Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
lol na i'm not trying to say that.. i'm saying for what it is designed for its better then the 3s .. 3s for performance .. 5s for everyday economical use ... ..
This post has been edited by macavely: Jun 17, 2005 - 8:09 AM -------------------- |
Jun 17, 2005 - 8:19 AM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
ooohh ok...well, you know, the 3s still kinda gets decent milage cosidering its a turbo motor ect..
-------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Jun 17, 2005 - 3:02 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 13, '02 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
maybe the higher number is worse (less performance, better mileage), eh? the supra is a 2j, then the 3s gt4, celica gt is 5s, st is 7a.
edit: oh and dont forget the 4a, fitting conveniently in the middle all u need now is a 1 and 6 This post has been edited by forkee: Jun 17, 2005 - 3:04 PM -------------------- |
Jun 17, 2005 - 3:31 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
1MZfe. it's a 6 cylinder, but...
|
Jun 17, 2005 - 4:53 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 28, '03 From Bloomington, IN Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
production costs
-------------------- NASA/SCCA RX-7....currently under the knife
92 Civic hatch B16 - Sold 10th anniv RX-7 - RIP The Slow Celica - Sold...and then crushed crushed due to street racing. Quote from Seinfeild: George's Boss reading a magazine: "People magazine's most beautiful people. Oh and a Celica...nothin wrong with that!" |
Jun 17, 2005 - 5:01 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 27, '05 From Rockville, MD Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
If lower the number, better the engine, How could a 4age be better than a 5sfe, or a 1zz better than a 2jz?
This post has been edited by Boss-Celica: Jun 17, 2005 - 5:10 PM -------------------- |
Jun 17, 2005 - 5:47 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 1, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i think its jsut the way they number the engines. You shouldnt think of it that they are always trying to improve on the engine. When they are, they create the 3rd gen 3s vs. the 2nd gen 3s.
When they 5s and 3s, think of it as the 3rd time they have used the s block and the 5th time they have used the s block. Although they were created using the same block, they were developed with very different requirments in mind. The 3rd time they used the s block as a base (3s) to start on, they requirements were performance and the ability to handle turbo pressures. The 5th time they used the s block as a starting base (5s), their requirements where fuel economy, long life, and cheaper production. -------------------- Its Orville's Celica, i just drive it... |
Jun 17, 2005 - 6:06 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Actually, from what I've read on MR2OC.com, the 5S block is stronger than the 3S block. Also I believe the crank is really tough and can be used to upgrade the 3S from 2.0L to 2.2L.
|
Jun 18, 2005 - 5:57 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 3, '05 From Richmond, B.C. Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
The block is determined by the second digit in the engine code: S block, M block, etc.
The preceeding number is the generation of the engine using that block. The 5SFE is therefore the fifth engine type to use the S block. The reason the 3SGE is better than the 5SFE has nothing to do with the block per se. It is the head geometry, reflected by the F or G. F is a narrow valve-angle head aimed at producing a more torque-oriented engine with low-end power for drivability and fuel economy. The G head is a wider angle, encouraging higher RPMs and thus higher HP peaks, with a greater overall output. The internals in the F-head engines are always lighter than in the G-head engines because they don't have to handle as much stress and, being lighter, encourage fuel economy. They last just as long as the internals of a G-head engine because their lighter build is matched to a lighter load. This would be why a 5SFE can never match a 3SGE's potential, particularly under boost, even though it has greater displacement -- it would break. I would, however, love for someone to explain how replacing a crank increases displacement, since it's the size of the combustion chambers contained in the head which determine displacement. |
Jun 18, 2005 - 6:15 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 13, '02 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
lol
-------------------- |
Jun 18, 2005 - 6:19 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 26, '03 From Wisconsin Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
i knew right away before i looked at the poster that this thread was mac's
-------------------- i am awesome
|
Jun 19, 2005 - 5:27 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Galcobar @ Jun 18, 2005 - 5:57 PM) I would, however, love for someone to explain how replacing a crank increases displacement, since it's the size of the combustion chambers contained in the head which determine displacement. [right][snapback]301030[/snapback][/right] http://www.mr2oc.com/showthread.php?t=7144...stroking+3s-gte |
Jun 19, 2005 - 5:05 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 3, '05 From Richmond, B.C. Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Changing the crank is not stroking the engine. Stroking the engine requires changing the crank, but that's only one part of essentially redesigning the engine internals.
|
Jun 19, 2005 - 11:50 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 8, '05 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
if toyota made a 5sgte it would be better...5s block is larger
|
Jun 20, 2005 - 12:01 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
IF, correct...
btw, using those numbers to compare different series is kind of tarded i think what Mac was getting at was staying w/in the Series. 3s-ge 3s-gte 5s-fe if you want to get into that try 1zz-fe 2zz-fe 1jz 2jz i think there's a 1jz at least :\ anyways, no more input, just want to read. -------------------- |
Jun 20, 2005 - 12:06 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Consynx @ Jun 20, 2005 - 12:01 AM) IF, correct... btw, using those numbers to compare different series is kind of tarded i think what Mac was getting at was staying w/in the Series. 3s-ge 3s-gte 5s-fe if you want to get into that try 1zz-fe 2zz-fe 1jz 2jz i think there's a 1jz at least :\ anyways, no more input, just want to read. [right][snapback]301576[/snapback][/right] Well theres no 2ZZ-FE, although theres a 2ZZ-GE. And yes there was a 1JZ-GTE. |
Jun 20, 2005 - 12:08 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
ah, so they changed the f to g, didn't know that...thought it was still f even though the vvtl-i was introduced and another 40hp squeezed out of the same engine.
-------------------- |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 2nd, 2024 - 5:37 PM |