6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Stock turbo cars vs. turbo'd cars, Whats more exhilerating?
post Apr 13, 2007 - 1:07 AM
+Quote Post
bccentaur3



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 29, '07
From Hoyt Lakes, MN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




Whats more fun to drive a stock turbo'd car with lets say 8psi vs. turbo'd car also at 8psi?


--------------------
98 Celica gt red- totaled deer
94 Celica st black DD (bad weather beater)- totaled deer
95 Celica gt silver- chassis sold
88 Celica All-Trac (Burned to a crisp)
94 Celica gt white (sold)

In need of a rust free chassis!!!!
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 10)
post Apr 13, 2007 - 5:43 AM
+Quote Post
presure2



Moderator
*****
Joined Oct 1, '02
From fall river, ma
Currently Offline

Reputation: 13 (100%)




it really depends on the cars, and the persons personal prefrence.
the 5sfte is best down low, and the 3s shines where the 5s falls off.


--------------------
Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)

13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered
post Apr 13, 2007 - 7:47 AM
+Quote Post
playr158



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 22, '03
From NOVA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 16 (100%)




you think the 3s shines because of the smaller displacement and its reaching its efficiency range, where as the 5s is a little larger and pushing past that range?

But no matter what a turbo car is going to be fun...you just notice the difference more in a kitted car because the difference in the way it runs is night and day, where as with an OEM turbo car you don't have the NA version to compare it to
post Apr 13, 2007 - 9:12 AM
+Quote Post
Hanyo

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 16, '03
From Bay area
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




There are always people who can build a turbo kit to mimic an OEM turbo car. So the comparison will be difficult.

It also matters on how the turbo kit car is built. Has the owner lowered compression?

But a basic bolt on turbo with minimum tuning vs a OEM turbo car, the OEM turbo car will be more fun. You wont need to deal with all the hassel of a aftermarket turbo. You wont have to deal with lag from runing over rich/lean.

and player, the 3s shines where the 5s block leaves off because of the more square engine design and higher flowing head. We can go on about this, but lets keep on topic.

post Apr 13, 2007 - 9:42 AM
+Quote Post
playr158



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 22, '03
From NOVA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 16 (100%)




point being this is NOT a comparison people should be making....
you can't compare a OEM turbo car (say my Jetta) to a 7afte celica...
its a night/day difference on a celica but on a jetta...yea its the same thing cause there is no NA version....

plus "the fun factor" isn't a measurable quantity of a static scale and varies from person to person...a 3s swap celica isn't as fun to me anymore because i've been in higher hp higher end cars a lot more....

its a scale with no constant full of variables....to each their own

and if you wanna make claim ya gotta say more then square motor
post Apr 13, 2007 - 9:48 AM
+Quote Post
bccentaur3



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 29, '07
From Hoyt Lakes, MN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




I have yet to drive a car that was n/a to turbo. I have driven factory turbo'd cas which was the evo and it wasn't as fun as I thought. I mean its an EVO for Pete's sake.


--------------------
98 Celica gt red- totaled deer
94 Celica st black DD (bad weather beater)- totaled deer
95 Celica gt silver- chassis sold
88 Celica All-Trac (Burned to a crisp)
94 Celica gt white (sold)

In need of a rust free chassis!!!!
post Apr 13, 2007 - 10:06 AM
+Quote Post
playr158



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 22, '03
From NOVA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 16 (100%)




EVOs aren't all that F&F make them out to be...

the only even i've drive made 400whp on the dyno....was nice but all it did was go fast in a straight line...so i guess it was fun, but nothing amazing
post Apr 13, 2007 - 10:39 AM
+Quote Post
Negative



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 28, '04
From Houston, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




The EVO VII I drove had full suspension upgrades and a very low drop with [I wanna say approx] 40 series tires and it handled much betterr than the STI I drove with similar mods but was nothing spectacular. The acceleration was very impressive but even with the upgraded sway bars, braces, struts etc it still had some pretty nasty body roll. Basically felt like a turbo corolla tho the STi was much worse. If I have to pay someone to do it i really crave driving a real ST-205. Just looking at the engineering of it I can see where it would handle soooo much better. I have driven ST-165 and ST-185 and they werre very impressive. ST-165 seemed very slow tho - even in the late '90's when I drove it.

This post has been edited by Negative: Apr 13, 2007 - 10:40 AM


--------------------
IPB Image
post Apr 13, 2007 - 11:11 AM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE
plus "the fun factor" isn't a measurable quantity of a static scale and varies from person to person...a 3s swap celica isn't as fun to me anymore because i've been in higher hp higher end cars a lot more....



thats like saying the ae86 corolla isn't a fun car because a supra makes more power. any 5sfTe, 7afte or 3sgte is going to turn your celica into a VERY fun car to drive. sometimes its not about making things the fastest, especially in a fwd car. you want to strike a balance between traction, hp, handling and stoping power to make for a fun car. regardless of how you turbo it, 200-300hp/tq in a celica is a blast.

getting back to the original question... i would buy a factory turbo car over something thats had a turbo kit installed. simply for the fact that its going to be more reliable, have better aftermarket support, and a clear a simple upgrade path to make two or three times the power it came with stock.

This post has been edited by lagos: Apr 13, 2007 - 11:17 AM


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post Apr 13, 2007 - 12:03 PM
+Quote Post
shin



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 21, '04
From New York City
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(lagos @ Apr 13, 2007 - 4:11 PM) [snapback]546389[/snapback]

QUOTE
plus "the fun factor" isn't a measurable quantity of a static scale and varies from person to person...a 3s swap celica isn't as fun to me anymore because i've been in higher hp higher end cars a lot more....



thats like saying the ae86 corolla isn't a fun car because a supra makes more power. any 5sfTe, 7afte or 3sgte is going to turn your celica into a VERY fun car to drive. sometimes its not about making things the fastest, especially in a fwd car. you want to strike a balance between traction, hp, handling and stoping power to make for a fun car. regardless of how you turbo it, 200-300hp/tq in a celica is a blast.

getting back to the original question... i would buy a factory turbo car over something thats had a turbo kit installed. simply for the fact that its going to be more reliable, have better aftermarket support, and a clear a simple upgrade path to make two or three times the power it came with stock.


werd smile.gif


--------------------
IPB Image
Turbo install made possible thanks to Team J.D.M.
officially 5SFTE junior member
~*MuH NeW RiDe*~
post Apr 13, 2007 - 4:13 PM
+Quote Post
easternpiro1



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 1, '05
From Charlotte NC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




QUOTE(lagos @ Apr 13, 2007 - 11:11 AM) [snapback]546389[/snapback]

QUOTE
plus "the fun factor" isn't a measurable quantity of a static scale and varies from person to person...a 3s swap celica isn't as fun to me anymore because i've been in higher hp higher end cars a lot more....



thats like saying the ae86 corolla isn't a fun car because a supra makes more power. any 5sfTe, 7afte or 3sgte is going to turn your celica into a VERY fun car to drive. sometimes its not about making things the fastest, especially in a fwd car. you want to strike a balance between traction, hp, handling and stoping power to make for a fun car. regardless of how you turbo it, 200-300hp/tq in a celica is a blast.

getting back to the original question... i would buy a factory turbo car over something thats had a turbo kit installed. simply for the fact that its going to be more reliable, have better aftermarket support, and a clear a simple upgrade path to make two or three times the power it came with stock.


X3 biggrin.gif

7afe-->3sgte =a pants wetting,unforgettable,orgasmic experience.

The difference from having a stock celica to turboed is NOT night and day... its HELL AND HEAVEN.
and thats the god honest troof!! biggrin.gif


--------------------

QUOTE (Galcobar @ Oct 15, 2008 - 2:44 AM) *
You want power but have no money. That's a problem.

Cheap. Reliable. Fast. Pick two.

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 28th, 2024 - 11:03 AM