 Is this right?, For you 3SGE out there... |
 Jan 8, 2008 - 2:49 PM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Jan 10, '06 From Mozambique, Africa Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%)  |
I was going through some of my old car files (yes, I keep everything!) and i found an old dyno sheet that i had from when i installed my "stage 1" on my celi. This is way before 6GC so I really wasn't up to par with my car as I am today (well, at least more now). At that time, before I installed the Injen filter my car tested:
Speed: 148km/h @ 6982 rpm Power: 104.1 kW @ 6791 rpm Torque: 163 Nm @ 4691 rpm Is this right? I don't know what 104 Kw is supposed to feel like, or maybe i'm just used to my car, but it doesn't feel like alot. A visiting friend rode with me and he said that my celi felt quick and he guessed at around 97kW. I mean, i know my car is quick on the overtake and the taking off, but i drove a 2007 Golf GTI last week and THAT was quick! What are other 3SGE's throwing out? I can post my dyno sheet tomorrow if anyone thinks I'm reading it wrong. --------------------  "Remember, amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. But revolutionaries built the Celica!"- Me |
 |
Replies
(1 - 6)
|
Jan 8, 2008 - 3:06 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Apr 17, '06 From New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 105 (100%) |
104.1 Kilowatts = 139.60 Horse Power
163 Newton Metres = 120.21 Pound feet 3SGE specs ! QUOTE In 1994 through 1997 Celicas, the 3S-GE only produced 177 hp@7000 rpm.
In 1994 through 1997 Celicas, the 3S-GE only produced 142 lbs.-ft. of torque@4800 rpm. This post has been edited by Culpable04: Jan 8, 2008 - 3:09 PM --------------------  |
|
Jan 8, 2008 - 3:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 10, '06 From Mozambique, Africa Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
Damn! So i still have a ways to go! Thanks, Culp!
-------------------- "Remember, amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. But revolutionaries built the Celica!"- Me |
|
Jan 8, 2008 - 3:23 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 17, '06 From New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 105 (100%) |
remember that the specs numbers are at crank and I'm assuming your numbers are at the wheels. so they are perfectly normal.
-------------------- |
|
Jan 8, 2008 - 4:18 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Dec 21, '06 From New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
That speed figure is certainly wrong
 . But yeah, as mentioned crank v. wheels.
--------------------  |
|
Jan 9, 2008 - 3:22 AM
|
|
 Moderator Joined Nov 5, '07 From New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
where are you takint the power from wheels or flywheel - because the stas take them from the flywheel
mine...114kW @ wheels (7000rpm) 148HP 124kW @ flywheel (my celica produced 132kW stock when in cam out...pretty good;)) maybe we should have a dyno thread for NA celicas (we have one for Turbo, but I felt silly posting my sheet:/) This post has been edited by Rusty: Jan 9, 2008 - 3:25 AM -------------------- |
|
Jan 9, 2008 - 3:24 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 10, '06 From Mozambique, Africa Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
QUOTE(Rusty @ Jan 9, 2008 - 10:22 AM) [snapback]629466[/snapback] where are you takint the power from wheels or flywheel - because the stas take them from the flywheel mine...114kW @ wheels (7000rpm) 148HP 124kW @ flywheel (my celica produced 132kW stock when in cam out...pretty good;)) maybe we should have a dyno thread for NA celicas (we have one for Turbo, but I felt silly posting my sheet:/) Let's do it! I'll scan mine tomorrow! -------------------- "Remember, amateurs built the ark and professionals built the Titanic. But revolutionaries built the Celica!"- Me |
 |
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 25th, 2024 - 1:02 PM |