6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> ST204 3SGTE VS ST205
post May 29, 2008 - 11:58 AM
+Quote Post
reko



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 17, '07
From Montreal, QC, Canada
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




On a quarter mile at race track X

A ST204 swapped with a 3SGTE 3rd gen + LSD tranny from MR2 (lighter but FWD with LSD)

VS

A ST205 with a 3SGTE 3rd gen (heavier but AWD)

who would normally win? and dont tell me ''well it depends on the driver and blablablablabla''.

I'm talking about perfect conditions, who would smoke who?


--------------------


5 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 19)
post May 29, 2008 - 12:25 PM
+Quote Post
99GT

Enthusiast
****
Joined Dec 14, '06
From MN, USA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




ST205 owns due to traction.
post May 29, 2008 - 12:31 PM
+Quote Post
808celica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 24, '07
From Oahu, Hawaii
Currently Offline

Reputation: 23 (100%)




yeah i dont even have to think. unless its a bone stock 205 and like a 800hp swapped laugh.gif 205 gets off the line really really fast......swapped just catches up later.....if and only if........he can launch without spinning and the line for too long....but then again im just dreaming biggrin.gif


--------------------
I don't normally drive fast, but when I do its on a curvy section of this island
post May 29, 2008 - 12:33 PM
+Quote Post
ETNRIDER



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 10, '06
From Knoxville, TN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (99GT @ May 29, 2008 - 12:25 PM) *
ST205 owns due to traction.



X2 thumbsup.gif

Traction is more important that a lot of people think.

This post has been edited by ETNRIDER: May 29, 2008 - 12:34 PM


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 12:43 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




St205 would be faster in the 1/4 because of awd.
St204 would be faster on the street "from a roll" because of less drive train loss.


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post May 29, 2008 - 12:58 PM
+Quote Post
ETNRIDER



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 10, '06
From Knoxville, TN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (lagos @ May 29, 2008 - 12:43 PM) *
St205 would be faster in the 1/4 because of awd.
St204 would be faster on the street "from a roll" because of less drive train loss.



Really? I wouldn't have guessed that, but I don't really know that much about all the details!! tongue.gif


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 1:47 PM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




I disagree.

Jeff with a 185 in his ran a 13.9 at the track
I have seen posts with st205s overseas that run 14s

a swapped to st205 FWD will beat an AWD st205 any day of the week on the 1/4 mile.

edit:post to back me up http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=30188

This post has been edited by Batman722: May 29, 2008 - 1:57 PM


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 2:00 PM
+Quote Post
x_itchy_b_x



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 12, '02
From Webster Ma.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




QUOTE (Batman722 @ May 29, 2008 - 2:47 PM) *
I disagree.

Jeff with a 185 in his ran a 13.9 at the track
I have seen posts with st205s overseas that run 14s

a swapped to st205 FWD will beat an AWD st205 any day of the week on the 1/4 mile.

edit:post to back me up http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=30188


agreed. weight is a factor. the awd will have you for... like the first 60 feet then youll slowly creep by.


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 2:11 PM
+Quote Post
ETNRIDER



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 10, '06
From Knoxville, TN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




Anyone got any vids of a race like this? I doubt it but you never know.

I see Batman722 link now.

This post has been edited by ETNRIDER: May 29, 2008 - 2:12 PM


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 2:24 PM
+Quote Post
Defgeph



Moderator
*****
Joined Apr 17, '03
From Rockland NY
Currently Offline

Reputation: 15 (100%)




BPU swapped FWD would win against a BPU ST205. Weight and drive train loss would be the two major factors in this race.

But this is only at the BPU stage. Once you go past 275-300HP, 205 takes the cake.



--------------------

I will return one day.
post May 29, 2008 - 2:26 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (Batman722 @ May 29, 2008 - 2:47 PM) *
I disagree.

Jeff with a 185 in his ran a 13.9 at the track
I have seen posts with st205s overseas that run 14s

a swapped to st205 FWD will beat an AWD st205 any day of the week on the 1/4 mile.

edit:post to back me up http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=30188


I guess its open to debate. imho AWD generally should run a better time because of the insanely low 60foot times it can achieve vs a fwd car. Thats why you often see stock subarus get impressive times 1/4mile times, yet loose to slower fwd cars on the street. Traction rules the 1/4mile.



--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post May 29, 2008 - 2:29 PM
+Quote Post
D-Man



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 18, '08
From Houston
Currently Offline

Reputation: 7 (100%)




but it's still heavier. The AWD gets better traction, true, but the FWD has less weight.

I say we get the 2 on the track and watch biggrin.gif


--------------------
QUOTE (presure2 @ Nov 6, 2010 - 6:16 AM)
Via FB: fcuking awsome!!! D-man FTW!

QUOTE (DEATH @ Nov 11, 2008 - 5:40 PM) *
Damn D-Man - most impressive.

QUOTE (99GT @ Nov 14, 2008 - 4:04 PM) *
D-Man's post should be a sticky

QUOTE (samir0189 @ Nov 4, 2008 - 10:50 AM) *
LOL, oh boy, you can always count on D-Man for ridiculously hilarious posts.
post May 29, 2008 - 2:39 PM
+Quote Post
lagos



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 31, '02
From Philadelphia, PA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (D-Man @ May 29, 2008 - 3:29 PM) *
but it's still heavier. The AWD gets better traction, true, but the FWD has less weight.

I say we get the 2 on the track and watch biggrin.gif


I guess in the celica world, this might hold true. I mean, look at the piss slow st185. Then again, I dont think most celica guys are good track drivers.


--------------------
15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
post May 29, 2008 - 2:41 PM
+Quote Post
ETNRIDER



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 10, '06
From Knoxville, TN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (D-Man @ May 29, 2008 - 3:29 PM) *
but it's still heavier. The AWD gets better traction, true, but the FWD has less weight.

I say we get the 2 on the track and watch biggrin.gif



I would love to see that!!!! thumbsup.gif


--------------------
post May 29, 2008 - 2:50 PM
+Quote Post
95celgt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 5, '03
From South TX.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




The 6th gen celica acually launches like a bat outta hell for a FWD.....when i took it to the track it would always leave other FWD's behind at the 60foot...
I even have video proof against the SS S/C biggrin.gif Integras would fall behind and even some GT mustangs...I miss my 3S mad.gif
post May 29, 2008 - 11:32 PM
+Quote Post
delusionz



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 11, '08
From Auckland, New Zealand
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




what the real question is ... is 400 metres really enough to catch a gt-four? a car length behind is more than nothing when you're 2000 rpm behind and struggling to gain traction


--------------------
Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR
GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC
269awhp / 273ft-lbs
post May 30, 2008 - 12:40 AM
+Quote Post
j0e_p3t



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 8, '05
From torrance/carson, ca
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




both stock and the fwd with lsd under "perfect" conditions... i think it'd be pretty damn close. but once you start adding more power, awd would definitely own.


--------------------
IPB Image
ss-iii splitters and 404 skirts are on. which means i need to update my sig.
post May 30, 2008 - 2:50 AM
+Quote Post
3SGTE



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jun 13, '07
From U.K
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Im already loading my gt4 st205 awd on a carrier and ill be over to the USA to settle this once and for all.... who's up for the challenge????? First though i gotta do the shopping and tidy the house!!! biggrin.gif


--------------------
post May 30, 2008 - 2:56 AM
+Quote Post
Insanity-74

Enthusiast
***
Joined Jan 9, '05
From Under the car
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Batman722 @ May 29, 2008 - 7:47 PM) *
I disagree.

Jeff with a 185 in his ran a 13.9 at the track
I have seen posts with st205s overseas that run 14s

a swapped to st205 FWD will beat an AWD st205 any day of the week on the 1/4 mile.

edit:post to back me up http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=30188


As much as it hurts to say this, I would have to agree up to a point....both running stock or near stock power then the FWD swap would win...weight means an awfull lot when it comes to quater mile drags....but once you get past say 300/350BHP then the AWD would be able to put the power down better so would be the winner.
post May 30, 2008 - 8:04 AM
+Quote Post
Cuts_the_Pilot



Enthusiast
***
Joined Dec 15, '02
From Tasmania(Australia)
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




stock for stock, or mod for mod 205 will win.
im not just biased, traction owns all.
as proof ive beaten 300kw rx7s at the drags because simply of launch.
and an rx7 gets more grip then any street fwd.

ive also beaten other carsa such as skylines and commodore utes and such. So its no fluke.
track has heaps more grip then street.
that is all.


--------------------
ST205 Group A Rallye GT-Four, #61 of 77............600hp GT3582r
GRX133 Toyota Mark X 350s

5 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
9 User(s) are reading this topic (9 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 21st, 2025 - 6:59 AM