6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Rod Comparison
post Sep 10, 2012 - 10:05 AM
+Quote Post
Smaay

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 8, '03
From Lancaster CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




Here are the rods from a 1MZ/3MZ, 2JZ and 2ZZ. Just for comparison, If i can come across a 5S-FE and 3S-GTE rod ill add them.





--------------------
2001 Celica GT-S Turbo
1997 Supra TT 6speed
1997 Celica 3MZ/1MZ swap
1990 Celica All-Trac
 
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 10)
post Sep 11, 2012 - 8:14 AM
+Quote Post
Special_Edy



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 29, '11
From Haltom City, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




Are the mz and jz rods interchangable? Wonder how much it would change compression
post Sep 11, 2012 - 8:54 AM
+Quote Post
Smaay

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 8, '03
From Lancaster CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




the xMZ rods look to be about 1/4 inch longer, i haven't measured the ends to see if the wrist pin is the same size and or the crank journal. if they are interchangeable they might be a good substitute witha custom piston that lowers the wrists pin.


--------------------
2001 Celica GT-S Turbo
1997 Supra TT 6speed
1997 Celica 3MZ/1MZ swap
1990 Celica All-Trac
post Sep 11, 2012 - 9:56 AM
+Quote Post
Special_Edy



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 29, '11
From Haltom City, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




I think that the longer rod is actually more efficient than a shorter one supposing the crank throw remains constant. Maybe you could find a way to stroke one of the engines. The 2JZ rod definately looks beefier than the 1mz/3mz rod.
Suppose you were to put forged pistons and 2jz rods in a MZ engine, and have the block decked down to the right CR, youd have a perfect setup for FI.
post Sep 12, 2012 - 2:03 PM
+Quote Post
Syaoran



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 4, '12
From US
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




More info and numbers! 5s-fe comparisons would be great.

Shorter rods are supposed to lower Comp. Ratio, given the stroke is the same and pistons are the same, right?

Something tells me the dimensions on the 2jz rods are going to be incredibly similar to 3sgte rods... Ive always seen the 2jz as a 3sgte with 50% more of everything ( 50% more rods, pistons, displacement, power and weight)

This post has been edited by Syaoran: Sep 12, 2012 - 2:16 PM


--------------------
1993 Celica GT Coupe - sold
1994 Celica GT Liftback
post Sep 12, 2012 - 2:25 PM
+Quote Post
Special_Edy



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 29, '11
From Haltom City, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




QUOTE (Syaoran @ Sep 12, 2012 - 2:03 PM) *
More info and numbers! 5s-fe comparisons would be great.

Shorter rods are supposed to lower Comp. Ratio, given the stroke is the same and pistons are the same, right?

Something tells me the dimensions on the 2jz rods are going to be incredibly similar to 3sgte rods... Ive always seen the 2jz as a 3sgte with 50% more of everything ( 50% more rods, pistons, displacement, power and weight)

Yeah theyd lower the CR, probably too much. Also, the longer the rod the more mechanical advantage it has to turn the crankshaft, and a longer piston reduces cylinder bore wear. Theres a tradeoff in it somewhere.
post Sep 12, 2012 - 5:29 PM
+Quote Post
Smaay

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 8, '03
From Lancaster CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




a shorter rod would cause the piston to come into contact with the counter balances on the crankshaft. (possibly)


--------------------
2001 Celica GT-S Turbo
1997 Supra TT 6speed
1997 Celica 3MZ/1MZ swap
1990 Celica All-Trac
post Sep 12, 2012 - 5:44 PM
+Quote Post
Syaoran



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 4, '12
From US
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




Toyota
2JZGTE/2JZGE
3.0L 93-98
Length-----BE Bore---BE Width----Wrist Pin Diameter
5.590" 2.166" 1.020" 0.866"


Toyota
3SGTE

5.433" 2.007" 1.055" 0.866"


Toyota
5SFE

5.435" 2.166" 1.055" 0.866"


According to that, the main difference is the big-end width. I don't know how that affects compatibility but the BE Bore is the same, wrist pin diamete is the same, and the length is a little longer, at 0.155" longer.

The rod:stroke ratio remains suitable, according to the same website which says that "when custom stroking an engine, rod:stroke ratio should remain between 1.5 and 2.0"

Stock 5S-FE Rod:Stroke Ratio = 1.5
5S-FE Stroke with 2JZ Rods Rod:Stroke Ratio = 1.54

Here's the website: http://www.xtremethings.com/Rod_Lengths.htm


--------------------
1993 Celica GT Coupe - sold
1994 Celica GT Liftback
post Sep 17, 2012 - 1:40 PM
+Quote Post
Syaoran



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 4, '12
From US
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




No updates on this??


--------------------
1993 Celica GT Coupe - sold
1994 Celica GT Liftback
post Sep 17, 2012 - 1:59 PM
+Quote Post
Special_Edy



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 29, '11
From Haltom City, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




We were waiting for Smaay to get his grubby mitts on a 3s and 5s rod
post Sep 17, 2012 - 4:04 PM
+Quote Post
Smaay

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 8, '03
From Lancaster CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




well thats not going to happen any time soon, unless someone wants to send me one


--------------------
2001 Celica GT-S Turbo
1997 Supra TT 6speed
1997 Celica 3MZ/1MZ swap
1990 Celica All-Trac

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 4:59 AM