Considering a 1994 Celica Gt hatch |
Considering a 1994 Celica Gt hatch |
Jul 10, 2013 - 8:43 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 10, '13 From Virginia Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Hey guys, first post. Long story short, I have a 2004 BMW 325i that is abysmal on MPG for some reason, no matter what I change, I can barely squeeze 20mpg. I am looking at a 1994 celica Gt hatchback auto, in hopes of getting a cheap reliable commuter car (70% hwy/30%city) that is better on gas than my BMW. My folks have a 1999 camry w/180K miles and absolutely no problems, so I am assuming the internals are similar and experience should be relatively similar? I found one on craigslist listed for 2200, black 1994 hatch w/ 141K miles. Is that a fair deal on these cars? What kind of MPGs are you guys seeing on your GT autos? Thanks!
This post has been edited by leb_toyota: Jul 10, 2013 - 8:46 PM |
Jul 11, 2013 - 7:28 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 18, '09 From Orlando Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
seller said only issue is the A/C doesn't get really cold.....how much $$$ to fix that? Sounds like you have to recharge the system with new refrigerant, an A/C recharge kit is $30-50. The only reason manual saves more gas is because you get to control your "throttle" basically. I would agree with Mr. Box again, it's not just that - upon deceleration, the torque converter's action causes more fuel to be used. As far as oil burning goes, mine records no burnt oil at 115k miles. This post has been edited by SwissFerdi: Jul 11, 2013 - 7:29 AM -------------------- '97 ST \ Eibach \ KYB \ Kenwood \ Alpine \ Cusco \ OEM+ [sold 10/18]
'93 MX-5 LE |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 26th, 2024 - 5:50 AM |