COLT CAMS, I need dyno results |
COLT CAMS, I need dyno results |
May 13, 2014 - 2:30 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 8, '12 From Hanford/Fresno, Ca Currently Offline Reputation: 20 (100%) |
As some of you know I'm looking into getting drop in camshaft into my 5sfe. I was wandering if anyone can shine a light and lmk what lift was this colt cam in this dyno result? I'm looking for dyno results for what colt calls this grind the "STAGE 1" grind which has a lift of 330. I want it to compare to the webcams grind since their webcam increases the upper end which is what I wanted.
-------------------- |
May 14, 2014 - 3:47 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 8, '12 From Hanford/Fresno, Ca Currently Offline Reputation: 20 (100%) |
^He also said that 318 lift is for the rev1 cams only. Rev2-3 he only does 330 or the 345. So I'm guessing the one presure2 did is the 330 cam? Still waiting on him or the owner to reply to confirm it. Since I wont be revving pass redline I should be safe with the stock valve springs with the 345 lift?
-------------------- |
May 14, 2014 - 6:30 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 4, '12 From US Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
^He also said that 318 lift is for the rev1 cams only. Rev2-3 he only does 330 or the 345. So I'm guessing the one presure2 did is the 330 cam? Still waiting on him or the owner to reply to confirm it. Since I wont be revving pass redline I should be safe with the stock valve springs with the 345 lift? Ask them what their recommendation is. They will most likely tell you it is recommended you get valve springs. For comparison, web cams known 294 grind is .322" 763 grind is .350" and they require valve springs. Their bolt-in turbo profile 779 is staggered .318/.337" It's odd the top end is worse than web cams on the one presure2 worked on if it had even more lift than the webcams 294. -------------------- 1993 Celica GT Coupe - sold
1994 Celica GT Liftback |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 12:47 PM |