Back Pressure in NA, Is it really needed? |
Back Pressure in NA, Is it really needed? |
Apr 18, 2004 - 8:11 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok, i know everyone says that Back Pressure is needed in NA engines but i need to know whether this is true.
Article If back pressure is actually REQUIRED, then why do you see dragsters w/ nothing but straight pipes coming directly off the engine? Isnt it more likely that a car simply loses power because its not tuned correctly? Granted there is going to be some back pressure caused by expanding gasses in teh dragsters exhaust, but minimal say compared to mufflers and such. I have read in several places that new cams and such will solve problems associated w/ loss of backpressure, and basically cars just arent stock set up to run w/ much less back pressure. So say you're allowed to do anything you want to an engine, besides overbore w/e, or FI, is almost no backpressure really bad? Say you had an exhaust like this.... CLICK but minus the turbo of the wrx? IONO maybe i'm rambling cuz i was just arguing w/ my friend about this.... -Ryan -------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Apr 20, 2004 - 10:52 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 24, '03 From Milton, Delaware Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok spedtoe, u seem to know ur stuff.Let me phrase it like this now... say we take any engine u want, remove all the exhaust including the headers, and then properly tune the engine however it needs to be tuned, will the engine yield less hp / tq with the headers / exhaust on it?
-------------------- AIM : FAQdaWorld
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 11:54 PM |