![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 31, '02 From Boise, ID Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
I'm thinking of selling my celica and getting an mr2 instead. I want to build myself a car I can run some rallies in, and the US celis are just too slow and heavy to make a good car. I am starting to get enough $$$ to actually upgrade the suspension and engine on a car, but I figured it would probably make sense to get a car that is a faster base.
I no longer need the back seat and larger inside of my celica, I drive a 1989 volvo 240 as my commuter and people hauler, so I now want something I can use on the weekend for a fun drive, and can work on, and maybe get involved in a little racing. Here are some of the advantages (I think) to both cars... if you can think of any others (especially if you own an mr2) add them... Celica- Back Seat + real trunk Safer in an accident cheaper to maintain better gas mileage (right?) Sexier looking (My opinion) Mr2Tubro- Bigger engine Mid engine so better balance (i think...) Lighter weight Whats the opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of each? Let me know! -------------------- ![]() psalm 69 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Michigan Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
the ONLY ONLY reason to go NA over turbo charged is for the linear powerband. the 3sgte is a very reliable motor, you just have to perform more regular maintanence on it and be more consistant with it. -------------------- ![]() Believer, you'll leave her, in leaving them all No but I don't buy it Like anything you do, as anyone you are Cause I'm... Ten Speed, of God's Blood & Burial |
||
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 24th, 2025 - 7:01 AM |