![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 1, '03 From LB gizzie, cali Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
who would win?.. I got a chance to see a 7gc GT-turbo in action the other day...it looked fast.. its running at 4psi low boost..and 8 psi at high pushing..200hp at 8psi.. thats basically it... do you think a 6gc 3s swap can eat up this 7gen turbo-gt?
or can the 7g turbo-gt spank us? -------------------- [color=#FF0000] I MISS MY RED BABY =(
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 29, '02 From San Diego CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
The way i see it is both cars have good potential. the 3s is good becuase people already know how much power it can kick out with a few extra goodies. The 1zz is still a new engine, tuners are still blowing the motors trying to see what works and what doesnt work. dont you think tuner shops blew a few 4a and 3s motors before they realized what was good and what was bad for it?!?! I say give the 1zz a few more years and super chargers and turbo kits will be readily available for higher boost. sure there are some already out but manufactures are building better and greater things off of that platform of the current turbo/supercharger platforms.
As for the 2zz motor, i think that motor is better off being a full NA motor. Probably even replacing the 4age motor .(it can happen) The compression is just a little to high to boost at high levels, plus to me and this is only my opinion i believe high compression and high reving motors should be left NA and not turbo'ed. So as far as this goes i like the 6gc looks and performance and i also like the 7th gens looks and performance. Both where meant for the auto x / circuit track and not really for drag racing. Just my 2 cents. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 20th, 2025 - 2:14 AM |