![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 13, '02 From Hawaii Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
-------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(recneps @ Nov 14, 2004 - 10:00 PM) QUOTE but i dont want just brute power, i want RELIABLE power. so 600hp doesn't mean anything if it barely lasts long enough to make it to a meet 2 hrs away. of couse, but name any 2.0l engine that is going to do 600+hp reliably. [right][snapback]206777[/snapback][/right] There is non, that is what im trying to point out. i don't want these stupid 600hp numbers, i want numbers that were attainable and ran almost daily for several months. with all these 600hp SR20s, well it just makes me pissed, because i know those internals can not handle that kind of power constantly. im not saying the 3S can, but i mean... i was reliable #'s the 3S SHOULD be around 450 IMO of reliable power; no problems, running happy. the SR20, well...i believe 500ish should be a good number for it, but i dont know how reliable it is at that point...check that florida company that does the 3S swap, they had some top-of-the-line kit for the SR20 that put out some good power. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 24th, 2025 - 3:36 PM |