So Bush...where are the WMD's?, friggin idiot... Options

[Sh0gunkid8721]

Bush and all his supporters, im sorry to say it are retarded. He has got to be the dumbest president on earth. dumb f* cker.

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.ad...112005909990004



WASHINGTON (Jan. 12) - The search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has quietly concluded without any evidence of the banned weapons that President Bush cited as justification for going to war, the White House said Wednesday.

The Iraq Survey Group, made up of some 1,200 military and intelligence specialists and support staff, spent nearly two years searching military installations, factories and laboratories whose equipment and products might be converted quickly to making weapons.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said there no longer is an active search for weapons. ''There may be a couple, a few people, that are focused on that'' but that it has largely concluded, he said.

''If they have any reports of (weapons of mass destruction) obviously they'll continue to follow up on those reports,'' McClellan said. ''A lot of their mission is focused elsewhere now.''

Chief U.S. weapons hunter Charles Duelfer is to deliver his final report on the search next month. ''It's not going to fundamentally alter the findings of his earlier report,'' McClellan said, referring to preliminary findings from last September. Duelfer reported then that Saddam Hussein not only had no weapons of mass destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no capability of making any either. Bush unapologetically defended his decision to invade Iraq.

Bush has appointed a panel to investigate why the intelligence about Iraq's weapons was wrong.


01-12-05 1157EST



This post has been edited by Sh0gunkid8721: Jan 12, 2005 - 1:55 PM

[Supersprynt]

You guys are bouncing from one extreme to another. Saddam was always a threat, but to whom, and how much is the question.

Edit: About the atmosphere of the site: no offense thats BS cuz this is a single thread if you dont wanna talk bout it dont come in and read this is an choice to be in here not a requirement. If you ignore the thread then nothing changes. There are alot of ppl who ignore these threads and thats all well and good but this is off topic and politics are a huge part of life. You cant get away from them but in here u can ignore them its easy.

This post has been edited by Supersprynt: Jan 12, 2005 - 4:52 PM

[Sh0gunkid8721]

You guys are bouncing from one extreme to another. Saddam was always a threat, but to whom, and how much is the question.
[right][snapback]232915[/snapback][/right]

notice my emphasis on the word "HUGE". Bin Laden is a MAJOR problem. and so is North Korea. In my opinion, they're a MUCH larger problem than Sadaam right now who has practically nothing. What has Sadaam done while Clinton was in office for 8 yrs? I havent even heard his name once i dont think.