So Bush...where are the WMD's?, friggin idiot... |
So Bush...where are the WMD's?, friggin idiot... |
Jan 12, 2005 - 1:52 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 22, '03 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Bush and all his supporters, im sorry to say it are retarded. He has got to be the dumbest president on earth. dumb f* cker.
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.ad...112005909990004 WASHINGTON (Jan. 12) - The search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq has quietly concluded without any evidence of the banned weapons that President Bush cited as justification for going to war, the White House said Wednesday. The Iraq Survey Group, made up of some 1,200 military and intelligence specialists and support staff, spent nearly two years searching military installations, factories and laboratories whose equipment and products might be converted quickly to making weapons. White House press secretary Scott McClellan said there no longer is an active search for weapons. ''There may be a couple, a few people, that are focused on that'' but that it has largely concluded, he said. ''If they have any reports of (weapons of mass destruction) obviously they'll continue to follow up on those reports,'' McClellan said. ''A lot of their mission is focused elsewhere now.'' Chief U.S. weapons hunter Charles Duelfer is to deliver his final report on the search next month. ''It's not going to fundamentally alter the findings of his earlier report,'' McClellan said, referring to preliminary findings from last September. Duelfer reported then that Saddam Hussein not only had no weapons of mass destruction and had not made any since 1991, but that he had no capability of making any either. Bush unapologetically defended his decision to invade Iraq. Bush has appointed a panel to investigate why the intelligence about Iraq's weapons was wrong. 01-12-05 1157EST This post has been edited by Sh0gunkid8721: Jan 12, 2005 - 1:55 PM -------------------- Note to new members. Discussions such as the ones below are forbidden.
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=26310&hl= |
Jan 20, 2005 - 11:39 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 17, '03 From Florence, KY Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
You fail to mention that although the big cities are full of welfare and poverty, they are also where the educated people in this country go to work. Example: Chicago, New York, San Francisco, L.A. In my personal experience, the ignorant and uneducated stay in rural areas while their educated peers migrate to more populous, thriving areas. It is a well-known fact that educated people (people with college degrees) overwhelmingly vote democrat. Also, the rural south and midwest are full of poverty (e.g. the Appalachian states) which benefit from social programs but because of their self-rhighteousness voted for Bush. Drive through rural Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennesse and it's just as scary as driving through the slums of a big city. Oh well, they're only hurting themselves. Bush won the election on one issue and one issue only: gay marriage. Everyone would rather fight a pointless war than have to put up with that crap.
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 10th, 2025 - 6:07 AM |