![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jul 4, '04 From 626 Ca Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
2 different cars w/ very similar bite. now i'd like to see what the 6th genners think..if you had to choose, which 1 would it be? and why?
EDIT: US specs This post has been edited by RyCeCuBe: Feb 20, 2005 - 5:45 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(SlowCelica94 @ Feb 20, 2005 - 9:06 PM) EVO. Mitsu has some little bugs due to poor quality, but nothing I'll lose sleep over. The subby has a horrible tranny and doesnt like to hold to warranty. But neither does. [right][snapback]248378[/snapback][/right] STI does not have a transmission failure rate anywhere near that of a normal WRX yes, both love voiding warranties, but in most cases, they are in the right. my WRX is probably making 325 crank hp now. a 45% increase in power puts plenty of extra stress on every part of the drivetrain people say mitsu has reps go to 1/4 mile tracks and take down licence plates of EVO's that are racing just to void warranties. i find that kinda funny RyCeCuBe it depends on what you want. STI feels like it has more power, due to the torque and the bigger displacment. EVO handles better IMO, the interior of the evo looks and feels cheap(except the seats) other than that, the cars are designed to compete with eachother, and are based off of race cars with specific requirements This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Feb 21, 2005 - 1:43 AM -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 23rd, 2025 - 5:43 AM |