6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> evo8 MR or wrx STi?
post Feb 20, 2005 - 3:31 PM
+Quote Post
RyCeCuBe



Enthusiast
*
Joined Jul 4, '04
From 626 Ca
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




2 different cars w/ very similar bite. now i'd like to see what the 6th genners think..if you had to choose, which 1 would it be? and why?
EDIT: US specs

This post has been edited by RyCeCuBe: Feb 20, 2005 - 5:45 PM
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Feb 21, 2005 - 1:37 AM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(SlowCelica94 @ Feb 20, 2005 - 9:06 PM)
EVO. Mitsu has some little bugs due to poor quality, but nothing I'll lose sleep over. The subby has a horrible tranny and doesnt like to hold to warranty. But neither does.
[right][snapback]248378[/snapback][/right]


STI does not have a transmission failure rate anywhere near that of a normal WRX

yes, both love voiding warranties, but in most cases, they are in the right. my WRX is probably making 325 crank hp now. a 45% increase in power puts plenty of extra stress on every part of the drivetrain

people say mitsu has reps go to 1/4 mile tracks and take down licence plates of EVO's that are racing just to void warranties. i find that kinda funny

RyCeCuBe

it depends on what you want. STI feels like it has more power, due to the torque and the bigger displacment. EVO handles better

IMO, the interior of the evo looks and feels cheap(except the seats)

other than that, the cars are designed to compete with eachother, and are based off of race cars with specific requirements

This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Feb 21, 2005 - 1:43 AM


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 23rd, 2025 - 5:43 AM