![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jul 4, '04 From 626 Ca Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
2 different cars w/ very similar bite. now i'd like to see what the 6th genners think..if you had to choose, which 1 would it be? and why?
EDIT: US specs This post has been edited by RyCeCuBe: Feb 20, 2005 - 5:45 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Feb 22, 2005 - 6:23 AM) I've driven a regular Evo, not the MR. In Car&Driver the MR slightly outperformed the STI. But I'd take an STI a helluva lot faster than an Evo. [right][snapback]248831[/snapback][/right] to quote motor trend: "IS 22 FEET WORTH $7000?" they tested all three Evo models for the march 2005 issue. at willow springs, the MR came out 22 ft ahead of the RS and 15.5ft ahead of the normal evo8 im all for buying the cheaper car and modding it with the extra money. stage 4 is comming, but not before a gearset. This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Feb 22, 2005 - 2:23 PM -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 23rd, 2025 - 6:22 AM |