GT vs Mazda3, Which is a better performer? |
GT vs Mazda3, Which is a better performer? |
Jun 2, 2005 - 12:10 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 26, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I dont take much part in the 6gc forums but spend time mostly viewing other peoples rides on this site..
So im keen on ur opinions on which car has better straight line performance, the Celi GT or the Mazda3 2.0l.. im curious because my friend has one and the specs are pretty similar. I think maybe my celi would have a slight edge with more low end torque, but the age difference in the cars might make a bit of a difference as well. Curious to know what u guys might think.. if u even care |
Jun 5, 2005 - 2:00 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 26, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Ok, these are the Australian specs i have found for the Mazda 3 on mazda.com.au.
Mazda3 Sedan 2.0L Specs: Max Power: 104kw@6500rpm (104kw = 139.5Hp) Max Torque: 181Nm@4500rpm (181Nm = 133.5 lb/ft) Kerb Weight: 1,195-1,206kg (1200kg = 2640 pounds!) lighter you say? don't think so Performance figures, according to Mazda's internal testing, for 0-100km/h is 9.0 seconds for 2.0-litre manual models. (That's its 0 - 60mph time) The Celica GT 0-60mph takes 8.5 secs. On paper, the Celi actually outdoes the Mazda 3 but sitting in the passenger seat of it, it does feel like its quick. Does it put power to the wheels better? |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 11th, 2025 - 10:43 AM |