The best supra |
The best supra |
Dec 15, 2005 - 12:20 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 3, '05 From Hollywood, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
check this out guys, I think its WAAAY to good to be true,
http://autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?car_id=1...ice=&cardist=32 a TT supra for under 20k? This post has been edited by bloodrain: Dec 17, 2005 - 3:02 PM -------------------- To live, is to suffer
To survive, thats to find meaning, in the suffering.... |
Dec 15, 2005 - 3:06 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
QUOTE(jgreening @ Dec 15, 2005 - 3:04 PM) [snapback]367639[/snapback] QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Dec 15, 2005 - 2:00 PM) [snapback]367635[/snapback] So what your saying is that the MR2 transmission, that I have in my car, thats FWD, is a RWD transmission, because its in an MR2, with the engine in the back. If it bolts up it bolts up, but your missing the problem with the fact that a Supra, which is RWD, needs a RWD transmission, you cant use an stock MR2 transmission, IDK why thats so hard to understand. I don't know what you mean by "RWD Transmission". Perhaps you mean "a transmission designed for FR car". However, my definition of RWD Transmission" is a transmission that drives the rear wheels of a car. Same difference, but your method of determining which is which forgets a main point: location of engine. Yes, you will need an FR transsmision, MRT is FF or RR, not FR. -------------------- |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 10th, 2025 - 8:59 PM |