![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 19, '04 From Scottsdale, Az Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
bump
This post has been edited by madmods: Mar 28, 2006 - 5:51 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 10, '05 From San Diego Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(nik @ Feb 22, 2006 - 5:49 PM) [snapback]397981[/snapback] QUOTE(Kwanza26 @ Feb 22, 2006 - 4:44 PM) [snapback]397978[/snapback] QUOTE(lagos @ Feb 22, 2006 - 10:28 PM) [snapback]397966[/snapback] finally somone who understands what im trying to say. I understand too... but goddamn people aren't gonna listen or open their minds to understand... so why bother? I'm willing to bet a vast majority of the 'future' swappers have NEVER driven a lightweight 200whp+ car... so they can say 'mild' all they want. There's nothing mild about 195-225 hp in a 2500 pounds car. thats why a crx with 200 whp can smoke alot of cars its not all about the power and traction thats a big part too but wieght is huge also thats the nice thing about some hondas the weight same with a corolla ae86 light so put a little power behind it and wow i have have driven both a AE86 turbo and CRX with a b16 that was built N/A ran 12's i would love to have both cars so true. just to further back this claim up. in the sticky about the 5sfte it says that a turbo 5s celica will be just about as fast as a mustang gt. mustang gt's have around 300 hp and 290 ft lb of torque. thats about 100 more than the celica but they are just as fast as one another.... however the celica weighs a lot less so its just as fast with 1/3 less power. the important part is the power to weight ratio, not just the raw power. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 22nd, 2025 - 2:23 AM |