different head/block combinations, frankenstein engines? |
different head/block combinations, frankenstein engines? |
Feb 26, 2006 - 6:43 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 23, '05 From Kansas City Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
So I was thinking about stuff I had read on the Honda forums a long time ago.
Would it be possible to put a 3sge head/cams/valves etc on a 5sfe bottom end? I know when I had my Prelude SI there were guys mating the H22 v-tec head and cams onto the H23 bottom end, the head just needed a couple small water jacket machinings and it would bolt up, guys were making a lot of HP with it. Didn't know if there would be some type of work like this done with our engines. -------------------- 1999 Celica GT
|
Feb 26, 2006 - 10:30 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
1. Toyota's aren't hondas.
2. Headswaps are geared towards generating more horsepower... .2 liter of displacement ain't sh!t... in fact, it'll hurt horsepower generation 3. can't have your cake and eat it too... small 4 cylinders cannot possibly make good horsepower AND hold a good useable torque band at the low-end... the way the engine makes horsepower simply cannot generate both. 4. search. I've posted a lot with regard to the 5S bottomend and horsepower... so search. -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Feb 27, 2006 - 12:19 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 23, '05 From Kansas City Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Kwanza26 @ Feb 26, 2006 - 9:30 PM) [snapback]400144[/snapback] 1. Toyota's aren't hondas. 2. Headswaps are geared towards generating more horsepower... .2 liter of displacement ain't sh!t... in fact, it'll hurt horsepower generation 3. can't have your cake and eat it too... small 4 cylinders cannot possibly make good horsepower AND hold a good useable torque band at the low-end... the way the engine makes horsepower simply cannot generate both. 4. search. I've posted a lot with regard to the 5S bottomend and horsepower... so search. 1. I know, that's why I asked the question 2. I realize they're geared towards generating more horsepower, and displacement isn't everything 3. Who said I wanted a use-able torque band? It was just a general question lol 4. I did search, but I can only spend so much time reading a lot of the same info looking for new stuff before I get sick of it. -------------------- 1999 Celica GT
|
Feb 27, 2006 - 12:28 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(blu94gt @ Feb 27, 2006 - 5:19 AM) [snapback]400224[/snapback] 1. I know, that's why I asked the question 2. I realize they're geared towards generating more horsepower, and displacement isn't everything 3. Who said I wanted a use-able torque band? It was just a general question lol 4. I did search, but I can only spend so much time reading a lot of the same info looking for new stuff before I get sick of it. 1. now it's answered 2. good... but if displacement isn't everything... why go through the trouble of building a 5SGE when a 3SGE can easily match it? 3. Why would you want to build a 5SGE if NOT for torque? There is no other reason. 4. If you cannot research... building the engine will be much harder... -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: December 11th, 2024 - 8:51 PM |