![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() Joined Nov 22, '05 From Mississauga, Ontario Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 18, '06 From NB, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) ![]() |
Theres sooooooooo many things fishy about it...but I'll just say one thing...
World trade center 7 did not collapse because of fire, sky scrapers don't collapse because of fire. hell, towers don't collapse from planes either! -------------------- ![]() -Rémy 02 SiR, 08 250R |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 14, '03 From Long Island, N.Y. Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Rayme @ Mar 9, 2006 - 10:17 AM) [snapback]405068[/snapback] Theres sooooooooo many things fishy about it...but I'll just say one thing... World trade center 7 did not collapse because of fire, sky scrapers don't collapse because of fire. hell, towers don't collapse from planes either! if you know anything about steel construction then you know metal has a yield point. When this yield point is exceeded, catastrophic failure is evident. The Metal beams will bend, not break, but this will cause serious structural damage. Structural failure also came from the two prior collapses of World Trade Center Tower 1 and Tower 2 falling on Tower 7. This obviously made the structure weak and vulnerable to a devastating fire. This post has been edited by Jdog1385: Mar 9, 2006 - 12:51 PM |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 18, '06 From NB, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Jdog1385 @ Mar 9, 2006 - 1:49 PM) [snapback]405152[/snapback] QUOTE(Rayme @ Mar 9, 2006 - 10:17 AM) [snapback]405068[/snapback] Theres sooooooooo many things fishy about it...but I'll just say one thing... World trade center 7 did not collapse because of fire, sky scrapers don't collapse because of fire. hell, towers don't collapse from planes either! if you know anything about steel construction then you know metal has a yield point. When this yield point is exceeded, catastrophic failure is evident. The Metal beams will bend, not break, but this will cause serious structural damage. Structural failure also came from the two prior collapses of World Trade Center Tower 1 and Tower 2 falling on Tower 7. This obviously made the structure weak and vulnerable to a devastating fire. WTC7 is kinda far from the towers to get debris from towers that ironicaly fell down destruction style on their own. If the theory of weaken metal would hold on well the towers would have leaned on the side it weakened first, it wouldnt have collapsed on its vertical axis. Beside the metal beams are coated wire isolation and jet fuel (that mostly burned upon impact) can't burn nearly enough to make it that hot. Even the engineering that made the towers said it was made to withstand a plane hit. Buildings are made to withstand earthquakes man, you think a couple debris, if any and a fire can make a biulding completely collapse on its own? And mimic a perfect destruction style collapse? If yes it seems we had the premiers of these events on that day. To it looks way too wierd to beleive whatever CNN tells us. I'm not denying planes hit these building on that day, people died, and god bless them(if it applies), I'm just saying theres something wayy more to it than that...if people wants to make their own opinion than just watch TV and beleive, let it be...but some take it too far, tries too much I agree. But we'll never know. No hating ![]() -------------------- ![]() -Rémy 02 SiR, 08 250R |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 18th, 2025 - 3:15 PM |