![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 30, '06 From Augusta, GA Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) ![]() |
so what kind of power and torque differences can i expect with a supercharger instead of a turbo with my 98 gt? any input is very appreciative!
-------------------- 2007 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 1974 Datsun 260Z 1997 Subaru Legacy L Wagon Kind of missin' my Celica GT! Hit me up if you're ever in my area. I'm always down for a meet. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Hanyo @ Apr 14, 2006 - 12:27 AM) [snapback]421431[/snapback] i prefer supercharger over turbo for our cars because of the characterists of our engines. Our engine have alot of torque in the midrange and very little on the high end. But pound for pound of boost a turbo will make more power. Lets say we have a 5sfe running on 5 psi of boost. a supercharge 5sfe will only make 150 hp, where as a turbocharged 5sfe will make 160. I voted supercharge because I prefer to have a constant predictable powerband. that depends on a lot of things, you cant just say any turbo will make more power pound for pound than a supercharger and a turbo will easily fix the horrible top end that these cars have. turbo is cheaper, and easier -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 17th, 2025 - 8:07 AM |