turbo vs. super, please input! |
turbo vs. super, please input! |
Apr 13, 2006 - 10:15 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 30, '06 From Augusta, GA Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
so what kind of power and torque differences can i expect with a supercharger instead of a turbo with my 98 gt? any input is very appreciative!
-------------------- 2007 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 1974 Datsun 260Z 1997 Subaru Legacy L Wagon Kind of missin' my Celica GT! Hit me up if you're ever in my area. I'm always down for a meet. |
Apr 15, 2006 - 3:33 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 17, '04 From St Louis, MO Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE Generally though: Reliability/predicability goes to supercharging, power/tunability goes to turbocharging. I have personally gone with turbos on all my cars because I like to tinker. If I wanted a 'set and forget' thing for 30-60k miles+, I'd try to find a supercharger option... +1 on that opinion... but like i said ...ultimate power sattisfaction imho is either turbo or centrifugal supercharger (which is still really a turbo)... -------------------- 2005 MB C200 Kompressor- K&N, Apexi WS2 Catback, DIY Voltage stabilizer, Intrax Springs, H&R RR swaybar, VDO Boost Gauge @ 6psi, Greddy L7 plugs, +0 Rear tires
To Do: E-manage Ultimate tuned up to 12psi |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 11:27 AM |