3sge engines, just wondering? |
3sge engines, just wondering? |
Apr 13, 2006 - 11:01 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 2, '06 From Bronx, New York Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Hey, I was just wondering how much hp does the 3sge engines come stock(not the "Beams" engines but the ones found in the early SSII's)? I'm just asking because I seen one for sale and I was just curious how fast they were. Thanx.
Quincy V. |
Apr 15, 2006 - 4:56 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I'm looking at installing a 3SGE motor into my rally car and have no intention of going down the BEAMS or turbo route.
After some research, it appears that the Gen II is a better option if you want more power due to the smaller inlet ports on the head. Saying that, the plan is to completely rebuilld the engine with uprated everything and aim for a higher CR and a rev limit around 9k. I'll also be looking at a decent set of throttle bodies too (which will require some ingenious firewall modifications!) See no reason why a flywheel figure of around 230bhp should be achievable. And with a Quaife straight cut gear set, the @ wheels figure should be over 200 given the reduced transmission losses. Not to shabby in a 1000kg (approx 2200lb) car Another reason for chosing the 3S motor is that due to it's 15 deg inclination, it will actually allow me to position the engine so that there is more weight directly over the front wheels and it will also give better weight distribution than most 4 pots. Just a shame that it doesn't have an alloy block. And before anyone says it, the 2ZZ motor won't fit as it is too long. The 3SGE does have quite a lot of potential, especially if you throw a lot of $ at it. However, not everyone has a large budget so it's not surprising that people go down the BEAMS route for decent power straight out of the box. But for racing purposes, I'd rather have a heavily worked 3SGE than a BEAMS for the simple reason that there is less to go wrong. Gary -------------------- 1994 ST205 Celica GT-FOUR Group A WRC - running in new engine 1993 Rover 220 GTi tarmac rally car (under construction) 3SGE power here we come.... GT-Four spec list |
Apr 16, 2006 - 11:49 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 8, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(GT4WRC @ Apr 15, 2006 - 4:56 PM) [snapback]421938[/snapback] However, not everyone has a large budget so it's not surprising that people go down the BEAMS route for decent power straight out of the box. If thats the reason why people aren't going the non-BEAMS route, then they're stupid. Obviously they haven't done their homework. If they did, they would know that the 3rd gen 3S-GE would be cheaper to get and less hassle to install than a BEAMS 3S-GE. The installation part only applies to a 6GC GT of course. So what surprises me is how people are not going the non-BEAMS 3S-GE route. They complain that they want something better but they can't spend the money on a 3S-GTE or a BEAMS 3S-GE. |
Apr 17, 2006 - 5:11 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Mar 17, '05 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(BLADDER_MASTER @ Apr 16, 2006 - 11:49 PM) [snapback]422374[/snapback] QUOTE(GT4WRC @ Apr 15, 2006 - 4:56 PM) [snapback]421938[/snapback] However, not everyone has a large budget so it's not surprising that people go down the BEAMS route for decent power straight out of the box. If thats the reason why people aren't going the non-BEAMS route, then they're stupid. Obviously they haven't done their homework. If they did, they would know that the 3rd gen 3S-GE would be cheaper to get and less hassle to install than a BEAMS 3S-GE. You obviously haven't understood a word of what I said have you? Sure, a 'standard' 3SGE motor is cheaper to buy than a BEAMS. But, a 3SGE makes less power out of the box and you need to start spending extra $ to get it up to the power level of a BEAMS. For that reason, a BEAMS conversion has the potential to work out cheaper in the end. Gary -------------------- 1994 ST205 Celica GT-FOUR Group A WRC - running in new engine 1993 Rover 220 GTi tarmac rally car (under construction) 3SGE power here we come.... GT-Four spec list |
Apr 24, 2006 - 5:51 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(GT4WRC @ Apr 17, 2006 - 10:11 AM) [snapback]422422[/snapback] You obviously haven't understood a word of what I said have you? Sure, a 'standard' 3SGE motor is cheaper to buy than a BEAMS. But, a 3SGE makes less power out of the box and you need to start spending extra $ to get it up to the power level of a BEAMS. For that reason, a BEAMS conversion has the potential to work out cheaper in the end. Gary I'm a little late into this debate... but I'd argue the BEAMS isn't worth the extra grand or two. The major powermaker differences between the BEAMS and a 3rd gen 3SGE are quite small, so I would argue you can build a 3rd gen to meet and surpass the BEAMS for the price of simply throwing in a BEAMS. VVTi is overrated from a horsepower performance standpoint, cause if you're gonna tune upwards of 240+hp n/a anyway, chances are you're gonna want to manually tune the cam timing. From a mechanical standpoint... they are very very similar (pretty much the same)... the BEAMS only has slightly more compression and a different head. I still hate the intake manifolds on those 3SGE's... but based on your other topic... that doesn't matter anyways... =D That pretty red valve cover is pretty neat though... -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 23rd, 2024 - 2:54 PM |