![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 3, '05 From Chicago Suburbs Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
On either the 20th or 27th I am going to do a couple of pulls on a dynojet, so I would like for you guys to guess the results... so:
Altitude: 176meters above the sea level, predicted temp. ~ 65-75F POWER MODS: '95 Gen III 3S-GTE swap 99' Solara v6 tranny Precision turbo FMIC (don't know the dimensions but i know its bar&plate) 2.5" mandrel bent IC piping Apex'i intake 3" catless downpipe (xs power.... ewww....) 3" catless custom mandrel bent exhaust (or DG exhaust) Magnaflow muffler Blitz DSBC I am going to do 2 pulls, one on stock boost ~14 psi and one at 17 psi, so guess for each pull. I do not have the boost controller and muffler yet, so if anyone wants to advise against, or recommend something better than blitz dsbc or magnaflow muffler, please do so quickly ![]() Ill post the graphs and runfiles right after the dyno session -------------------- QUOTE(tufy @ Jul 19, 2006 - 7:40 AM) [snapback]458074[/snapback] i dont drive fast, i just fly low |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
when u go to the dyno, can you make sure they give you the run file, and can you post it here? also, make sure they log your a/f with a wide band o2 sensor. id love to see how the 2nd and 3rd gen swaps compare on a dyno.
my guess ... youll make around 260-280 hp...somwhere in that ballpark. -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(lagos @ May 10, 2006 - 3:31 PM) [snapback]432508[/snapback] when u go to the dyno, can you make sure they give you the run file, and can you post it here? also, make sure they log your a/f with a wide band o2 sensor. id love to see how the 2nd and 3rd gen swaps compare on a dyno. my guess ... youll make around 260-280 hp...somwhere in that ballpark. If you are talking whp with a ct20b, I say you are way off. I will guess 240whp at 17psi. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 3, '05 From Chicago Suburbs Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(jgreening @ May 10, 2006 - 8:22 PM) [snapback]432616[/snapback] QUOTE(lagos @ May 10, 2006 - 3:31 PM) [snapback]432508[/snapback] when u go to the dyno, can you make sure they give you the run file, and can you post it here? also, make sure they log your a/f with a wide band o2 sensor. id love to see how the 2nd and 3rd gen swaps compare on a dyno. my guess ... youll make around 260-280 hp...somwhere in that ballpark. If you are talking whp with a ct20b, I say you are way off. I will guess 240whp at 17psi. Why such low estimate Jay ? My only worry is knock related retard coz of 93 octane on jdm ecu maps... should i add xylene/toulene/race gas for the dyno run? or is that cheating ![]() I found a couple of dyno pulls of gen3 + BPU + pump gas http://mr2oc.com/showthread.php?t=171601 93 octane, mbc, apexi intake and open 3" DP 263 hp 265 ft/lb tq @ 18 psi 239 hp 246 ft/ lb tq @ 16 thats with ignition problems... other guy with similar mods got 235whp with stock boost and healthy ignition http://mr2oc.com/showthread.php?t=45631 stock ecu, pump gas, bpu 229hp 221tq @ 10 psi (how can you get 10 psi when WG is on like 14psi actuator ????) 252hp 274tq @ 16 psi My guess is 255-265 whp -------------------- QUOTE(tufy @ Jul 19, 2006 - 7:40 AM) [snapback]458074[/snapback] i dont drive fast, i just fly low |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(CilverSeliST205 @ May 10, 2006 - 10:41 PM) [snapback]432699[/snapback] QUOTE(jgreening @ May 10, 2006 - 8:22 PM) [snapback]432616[/snapback] QUOTE(lagos @ May 10, 2006 - 3:31 PM) [snapback]432508[/snapback] when u go to the dyno, can you make sure they give you the run file, and can you post it here? also, make sure they log your a/f with a wide band o2 sensor. id love to see how the 2nd and 3rd gen swaps compare on a dyno. my guess ... youll make around 260-280 hp...somwhere in that ballpark. If you are talking whp with a ct20b, I say you are way off. I will guess 240whp at 17psi. Why such low estimate Jay ? My only worry is knock related retard coz of 93 octane on jdm ecu maps... should i add xylene/toulene/race gas for the dyno run? or is that cheating ![]() I found a couple of dyno pulls of gen3 + BPU + pump gas http://mr2oc.com/showthread.php?t=171601 93 octane, mbc, apexi intake and open 3" DP 263 hp 265 ft/lb tq @ 18 psi 239 hp 246 ft/ lb tq @ 16 thats with ignition problems... other guy with similar mods got 235whp with stock boost and healthy ignition http://mr2oc.com/showthread.php?t=45631 stock ecu, pump gas, bpu 229hp 221tq @ 10 psi (how can you get 10 psi when WG is on like 14psi actuator ????) 252hp 274tq @ 16 psi My guess is 255-265 whp Don't get me wrong, I hope you do better and wish you well. Most of all, have fun. However, you asked me to make guess, and I did. The basic reason is that the ct20b cannot overcome the fall-off due to stock cams. Getting above 260whp on a stock cam / stock turbo 3sgte is difficult without tuning. On a gen II, its very difficult to get over 240whp due to the stock fuel maps - although Jeff and some others on mr2oc.com have done it. Its a little easier on a gen III because every breathing modification you put on makes your car run leaner and that adds power. It also increases risk of blowing the engine if you are not tuning or at least monitoring the a/f ratio. Which leads me to my last point: do not do a dyno run on a modded gen III without a wideband hooked up and being prepared to cut the run if you go over 12 a/f ratio. Good luck. Jay -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 3, '05 From Chicago Suburbs Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(jgreening @ May 11, 2006 - 5:42 PM) [snapback]432976[/snapback] Don't get me wrong, I hope you do better and wish you well. Most of all, have fun. However, you asked me to make guess, and I did. The basic reason is that the ct20b cannot overcome the fall-off due to stock cams. Getting above 260whp on a stock cam / stock turbo 3sgte is difficult without tuning. On a gen II, its very difficult to get over 240whp due to the stock fuel maps - although Jeff and some others on mr2oc.com have done it. Its a little easier on a gen III because every breathing modification you put on makes your car run leaner and that adds power. It also increases risk of blowing the engine if you are not tuning or at least monitoring the a/f ratio. Which leads me to my last point: do not do a dyno run on a modded gen III without a wideband hooked up and being prepared to cut the run if you go over 12 a/f ratio. Good luck. Jay ![]() Why breathing mods make the mixture leaner in gen3? is it because of MAP sensor based fueling? I know oem ecu likes to run really rich on boost in mid-top end, but if I see my A/F too lean to be on the safe side then what can I do to add more fuel? FPR, piggyback fuel controller ? or is EMS the only way ? Also how can I shift the boost cut a bit higher than 17-18 psi on a MAP setup? -------------------- QUOTE(tufy @ Jul 19, 2006 - 7:40 AM) [snapback]458074[/snapback] i dont drive fast, i just fly low |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(CilverSeliST205 @ May 12, 2006 - 12:45 AM) [snapback]433144[/snapback] Why breathing mods make the mixture leaner in gen3? is it because of MAP sensor based fueling? I know oem ecu likes to run really rich on boost in mid-top end, but if I see my A/F too lean to be on the safe side then what can I do to add more fuel? FPR, piggyback fuel controller ? or is EMS the only way ? Also how can I shift the boost cut a bit higher than 17-18 psi on a MAP setup? Yes. A map system adds fuel based on air pressure - not flow like an AFM equipped Gen II 3sgte. Thus, when you increase flow with a breathing modification like a new exhaust, the pressure could theoretically stay the same (or even be reduced) which would tell the ECU to keep the fuel the same (or reduce it) but the air content in the mixture will be much higher - causing a more lean condition. Ricky B from MR Controls reports that he has seen many modded Gen III set ups that run on the ragged edge of safety. The bottom line is be careful, and be smart. Yes. No, its not the only way but it is the best way. I am pretty sure you can get a FCD for a gen III. Some other folks on here will know for sure though. If you get an EMS, you can set fuel cut at anything you want including eliminating it all together if you want. -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 3, '05 From Chicago Suburbs Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(jgreening @ May 12, 2006 - 8:32 AM) [snapback]433207[/snapback] Yes. A map system adds fuel based on air pressure - not flow like an AFM equipped Gen II 3sgte. Thus, when you increase flow with a breathing modification like a new exhaust, the pressure could theoretically stay the same (or even be reduced) which would tell the ECU to keep the fuel the same (or reduce it) but the air content in the mixture will be much higher - causing a more lean condition. I have hard time understanding how you can increase flow without increasing the pressure? Isn't pressure directly proportional to flow? For example, if i get rid of an restrictive intake in favor of a short ram i will increase the flow -> flowing more air into the mani -> producing more manifold pressure ?? Enlighten me please ![]() Another thing is FCD, how would such thing work on a gen3 ? It can't just cut off MAP signal, and altering it would cause very dangerous mixture leaning... -------------------- QUOTE(tufy @ Jul 19, 2006 - 7:40 AM) [snapback]458074[/snapback] i dont drive fast, i just fly low |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 23rd, 2025 - 9:53 PM |