![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Fastbird @ Jul 9, 2006 - 7:36 PM) [snapback]453830[/snapback] QUOTE(gtfc115 @ Jul 9, 2006 - 2:22 PM) [snapback]453714[/snapback] is that an ATS TB inlet? looks nice. i ordered one last week! Yup, I ordered that and the GM Knock Sensor Conversion for Doc to install. Along with the healthy dose of goodies that he's putting in the car.......should be really niiiiiiice. ![]() i woudlnt recomend using the GM knock sensor. it dosnt work correctly for our cars and ats should stop selling it imho. keep the stock sensor. -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 3, '04 From Hollywood, MD Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) ![]() |
thanks for clearing it up jay, im going to have to say that i would definitly go OEM with a sensor like a knock sensor, but at the same time fastbird and tweak are big boys and if they choose to go that route even after reading the warnings then that is between them
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(brianforster @ Jul 11, 2006 - 9:21 PM) [snapback]454844[/snapback] thanks for clearing it up jay, im going to have to say that i would definitly go OEM with a sensor like a knock sensor, but at the same time fastbird and tweak are big boys and if they choose to go that route even after reading the warnings then that is between them ![]() I agree. But, Doc's attacks on Art were out of line, IMO. Art does more for this community in providing information and troubleshooting advice than ANYBODY! Plus I like his hair. ![]() -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 31, '04 From Summerville, SC Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(jgreening @ Jul 12, 2006 - 2:32 AM) [snapback]454848[/snapback] QUOTE(brianforster @ Jul 11, 2006 - 9:21 PM) [snapback]454844[/snapback] thanks for clearing it up jay, im going to have to say that i would definitly go OEM with a sensor like a knock sensor, but at the same time fastbird and tweak are big boys and if they choose to go that route even after reading the warnings then that is between them ![]() I agree. But, Doc's attacks on Art were out of line, IMO. Art does more for this community in providing information and troubleshooting advice than ANYBODY! Plus I like his hair. ![]() I'm going to have to see this hair I think ![]() Back to the subject at hand, jgreening, you're still going back to the issue of using the GM knock sensor to "fix" a knocking engine. As I agreed, that's not the right reason to use this and would be a bad idea. The problem has to be fixed, not the symptom! But from the research I've seen and my own experience, there's no problem using a GM knock sensor as a less expensive replacement. A good thing to think of is that if you purchase an MSD knock monitor, it comes with a GM sensor. Since this is a device that a tuner would use on a dyno to watch for detonation, and it's accurate enough for that, then wouldn't it be accurate enough for the ECU? -Doc This post has been edited by Dr_Tweak: Jul 14, 2006 - 7:05 AM -------------------- -Dr Tweak, 6GC's resident engine swap wiring expert extraordinaire Click here to see my swaps drtweak@phoenixtuning.com |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 10, '03 From Wichita, KS Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Dr_Tweak @ Jul 11, 2006 - 10:21 PM) [snapback]454870[/snapback] Back to the subject at hand, jgreening, you're still going back to the issue of using the GM knock sensor to "fix" a knocking engine. As I agreed, that's not the right reason to use this and would be a bad idea. The problem has to be fixed, not the symptom! But from the research I've seen and my own experience, there's no problem using a GM knock sensor as a less expensive replacement. A good thing to think of is that if you purchase an MSD knock monitor, it comes with a GM sensor. Since this is a device that a tuner would use on a dyno to watch for detonation, and it's accurate enough for that, then wouldn't it be accurate enough for the ECU? -Doc If it can be used to "fix" a knock problem it can let that same problem exist where a stock knock sensor would alert the ECU. That's not something I want to happen. I'll stick with a sensor that is designed for the frequency that our blocks resonate at. MSD knock monitor is just another tool. Just because it can detect knock doesn't mean it was meant for our ECU... This has already been covered in the MR2OC post that Jay linked to. This post has been edited by WannabeGT4: Jul 11, 2006 - 10:31 PM -------------------- ![]() Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete... |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 22nd, 2025 - 12:05 AM |