![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 29, '05 From So-Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) ![]() |
![]() This post has been edited by chacha: Jul 13, 2006 - 2:42 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 29, '05 From So-Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) ![]() |
hmmm..which is better for better power and better efficiency for no turbo lag?
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 3, '05 From Chicago Suburbs Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(chacha @ Jul 13, 2006 - 12:30 PM) [snapback]455648[/snapback] hmmm..which is better for better power and better efficiency for no turbo lag? ct27 marginally more peak hp ct20b marginally quicker spoolup (only w/ ceramic turbine ?) they are very similar in terms of efficency QUOTE ct-20b's are basicly unrebuildable in the USA cause you cant get the parts for them I have seen few ct20b rebuild kits on ebay for under $100 This post has been edited by CilverSeliST205: Jul 13, 2006 - 1:15 PM -------------------- QUOTE(tufy @ Jul 19, 2006 - 7:40 AM) [snapback]458074[/snapback] i dont drive fast, i just fly low |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 22nd, 2025 - 3:58 PM |