2nd gen Eclipse GSX vs. 6th gen Celica GT-Four, pros an cons of each |
2nd gen Eclipse GSX vs. 6th gen Celica GT-Four, pros an cons of each |
Nov 14, 2006 - 9:56 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 2, '06 From Boston Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Well I want a GSX cuz I'm sucka for AWD Turbo coupes but I've always like the 6th gen celica as well but from a performance point of view it seemed like the the GSX was the obvious choice until I found out about the GT-Four that never made it to the states. So which do you think is better and why? There's a GSX running 6.97 in the quarter mile so what do you guys think?
|
Nov 15, 2006 - 12:32 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 12, '02 From Columbus, Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 15 (100%) |
Not to defend DSM's but crankwalk was fixed after 97'. Aside from that my friends haven't had any problems. One has 450whp the other has 265whp.
|
Nov 15, 2006 - 1:09 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Sep 28, '06 From Montreal, QC, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
QUOTE(celica3sgte @ Nov 15, 2006 - 12:32 PM) [snapback]502584[/snapback] Not to defend DSM's but crankwalk was fixed after 97'. Really not sure about that, not enough to start an argument about it anyway. But none of my problems were crankwalk-related. As for a modded car, it wasn't much. KYB AGX's, FMIC, boost controller (14 psi, stock is 9), 2.5" cat back, high flow cat, upgraded turbo. I would say that one of the pros of the DSM's is how easily you can mod them. And there's a boatload of parts. And the leather is oh so comfy -------------------- One o'dem crazy Canadian freaks, eh?
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 25th, 2024 - 8:29 AM |