gas mileage worse after chrome intakes., i thought it was supposed to get better? |
gas mileage worse after chrome intakes., i thought it was supposed to get better? |
Feb 26, 2007 - 12:15 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 28, '05 From MB, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
hey,
I installed this chrome intakes ram air on my ST a few months ago and since I've installed it I've gotten about 100km/tank less than i used to with my stock intake. Was I wrong in thinking the gas mileage would get better if not stay the same? could i have possibly done something wrong? (it's pretty simple, i don't think i goofed on anything.) |
Feb 26, 2007 - 11:52 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 5, '05 From pineapple under the sea Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
QUOTE if your logic was good, every car would get extremely good mileage in winter. But its quite the very opposite, it drops buy almost 25% + How do you figure? It has been proven by many companies (including K&N) and I will even say that my CAI has improved gas mileage. It allows cooler, denser air into the combustion chamber. It is more efficient than short ram, because short ram sucks in the hot air right underneath the hood, which is less dense, yielding little to no gain over factory air box. -------------------- 1991 MR2 - T-tops - Crimson Red - Gen3 3SGTE - Lots of money
I'm not really an asshole, but I play one on the internet. **** Photobucket |
Feb 26, 2007 - 3:44 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 18, '06 From NB, Canada Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) |
QUOTE(95CelicaST @ Feb 26, 2007 - 12:52 PM) [snapback]530412[/snapback] QUOTE if your logic was good, every car would get extremely good mileage in winter. But its quite the very opposite, it drops buy almost 25% + How do you figure? It has been proven by many companies (including K&N) and I will even say that my CAI has improved gas mileage. It allows cooler, denser air into the combustion chamber. It is more efficient than short ram, because short ram sucks in the hot air right underneath the hood, which is less dense, yielding little to no gain over factory air box. Because its just a fact, I get 500KM in summer and barely hit 400 in winter with a full tank of gas. Same road to work every week. And guess what? Your factory toyota intake is a "cold air ram intake", the only gain you get from those aftermarket intakes is the restriction you remove from the stock system, it has nothing to do with cold or hot air. Marketing baby! -------------------- -Rémy 02 SiR, 08 250R |
Feb 26, 2007 - 3:58 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) |
QUOTE(Rayme @ Feb 26, 2007 - 3:44 PM) [snapback]530508[/snapback] QUOTE(95CelicaST @ Feb 26, 2007 - 12:52 PM) [snapback]530412[/snapback] QUOTE if your logic was good, every car would get extremely good mileage in winter. But its quite the very opposite, it drops buy almost 25% + How do you figure? It has been proven by many companies (including K&N) and I will even say that my CAI has improved gas mileage. It allows cooler, denser air into the combustion chamber. It is more efficient than short ram, because short ram sucks in the hot air right underneath the hood, which is less dense, yielding little to no gain over factory air box. Because its just a fact, I get 500KM in summer and barely hit 400 in winter with a full tank of gas. Same road to work every week. And guess what? Your factory toyota intake is a "cold air ram intake", the only gain you get from those aftermarket intakes is the restriction you remove from the stock system, it has nothing to do with cold or hot air. Marketing baby! you're retarded if you think air temp has nothing to do with this......maybe cars work different in canada.....cause i'm sure my boosted car would love some 90* hot air for high boost levels!!!!! This post has been edited by playr158: Feb 26, 2007 - 3:59 PM |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 12:36 AM |