6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Tranny, Diffrence betwwen the s54 and E153
post Mar 4, 2007 - 6:19 AM
+Quote Post
Alan



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jan 23, '05
From Malta
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




Does anyone know the diffrence with the 2 tranny as in gear ratios and final drives and may be someone can point out which tranny is better, if you where to compare them to one another.


--------------------
IPB Image
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 AM
+Quote Post
celicaST



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 23, '05
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




S-54: 3.285, 1.960, 1.322, 1.028, 0.820 / FD: 3.944, 4.176
-3.944 diff found in JDM/UK 2nd and 3rd gen 3S-GE
-4.176 diff found in MK2 MR2 NA and 6gc GT
S-51: 3.538, 1.960, 1.250, 0.945, 0.731 / FD: 3.944
- found in I4 Camry
E-153: 3.230, 1.913, 1.258, 0.918, 0.731 / FD: 3.933, 4.285
-3.933 diff found in V6 Camry
-4.285 diff found in MK2 MR2 turbo
-V6 E-153 upgraded from 2 to 3 synchros 93+

e-153 is a good deal stronger than the s-54, however it is also significantly heavier (around 70lbs if i remember correctly, dont quote me on that).


--------------------
IPB Image

I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside.

Posts in this topic
- Alan   Tranny   Mar 4, 2007 - 6:19 AM
- - celicaST   S-54: 3.285, 1.960, 1.322, 1.028, 0.820 / FD: 3.94...   Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 AM
- - Alan   QUOTE(celicaST @ Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 ...   Mar 4, 2007 - 10:48 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 30th, 2024 - 9:19 PM