6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Tranny, Diffrence betwwen the s54 and E153
post Mar 4, 2007 - 6:19 AM
+Quote Post
Alan



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jan 23, '05
From Malta
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




Does anyone know the diffrence with the 2 tranny as in gear ratios and final drives and may be someone can point out which tranny is better, if you where to compare them to one another.


--------------------
IPB Image
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 AM
+Quote Post
celicaST



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 23, '05
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




S-54: 3.285, 1.960, 1.322, 1.028, 0.820 / FD: 3.944, 4.176
-3.944 diff found in JDM/UK 2nd and 3rd gen 3S-GE
-4.176 diff found in MK2 MR2 NA and 6gc GT
S-51: 3.538, 1.960, 1.250, 0.945, 0.731 / FD: 3.944
- found in I4 Camry
E-153: 3.230, 1.913, 1.258, 0.918, 0.731 / FD: 3.933, 4.285
-3.933 diff found in V6 Camry
-4.285 diff found in MK2 MR2 turbo
-V6 E-153 upgraded from 2 to 3 synchros 93+

e-153 is a good deal stronger than the s-54, however it is also significantly heavier (around 70lbs if i remember correctly, dont quote me on that).


--------------------
IPB Image

I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside.
post Mar 4, 2007 - 10:48 AM
+Quote Post
Alan



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jan 23, '05
From Malta
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




QUOTE(celicaST @ Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 AM) [snapback]532687[/snapback]

S-54: 3.285, 1.960, 1.322, 1.028, 0.820 / FD: 3.944, 4.176
-3.944 diff found in JDM/UK 2nd and 3rd gen 3S-GE
-4.176 diff found in MK2 MR2 NA and 6gc GT
S-51: 3.538, 1.960, 1.250, 0.945, 0.731 / FD: 3.944
- found in I4 Camry
E-153: 3.230, 1.913, 1.258, 0.918, 0.731 / FD: 3.933, 4.285
-3.933 diff found in V6 Camry
-4.285 diff found in MK2 MR2 turbo
-V6 E-153 upgraded from 2 to 3 synchros 93+

e-153 is a good deal stronger than the s-54, however it is also significantly heavier (around 70lbs if i remember correctly, dont quote me on that).



Excellent man, thats the info I needed, the best smile.gif
I have the S54 gearbox, I am going to convert it to a Race dogbox with sequential Shifter for drag racing, ohh and 6speed. but I think I will use the E153 as the primary shaft where the clutch disc gets connected is smaller on the S54 and it is easier for me to buy clutches with larger amount of toruqe that can be transmitted to the engine.

What do you think?


--------------------
IPB Image

Posts in this topic
- Alan   Tranny   Mar 4, 2007 - 6:19 AM
- - celicaST   S-54: 3.285, 1.960, 1.322, 1.028, 0.820 / FD: 3.94...   Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 AM
- - Alan   QUOTE(celicaST @ Mar 4, 2007 - 9:27 ...   Mar 4, 2007 - 10:48 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: December 2nd, 2024 - 8:06 PM