6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> corvette vs GT4, how the heck
post Apr 26, 2007 - 8:53 PM
+Quote Post
peroxwhysm00

Enthusiast
*
Joined Mar 4, '07
From bayville
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




the 5SFTE that pressure2 did gets 1/4 mile in mid 13s....a 1994 corvette LT-1, w/ 300hp 340tq, (auto) get 14.1's? pressure2 has 235hp and 274 tq i think, and he would beat the vette...how is that possible?? theres a huge power difference and i just dont understand...

its just a question i had and im wanderin the logical answer to this....B/c my dad has a 94 LT1 vette (stick) so he would run 13's, and i wanted to race him as soon as im done doin the same thing pressure2 did...

if you can explain this to me any one then thank you
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Apr 26, 2007 - 10:38 PM
+Quote Post
bccentaur3



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 29, '07
From Hoyt Lakes, MN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




I always figured that a rear wheel drive vs. a front wheel drive with the same power, the rear wheel drive will take it any day.


--------------------
98 Celica gt red- totaled deer
94 Celica st black DD (bad weather beater)- totaled deer
95 Celica gt silver- chassis sold
88 Celica All-Trac (Burned to a crisp)
94 Celica gt white (sold)

In need of a rust free chassis!!!!
post Apr 29, 2007 - 6:46 PM
+Quote Post
Zimluura



Enthusiast
**
Joined Feb 3, '05
From USA/Virginia
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




QUOTE(bccentaur3 @ Apr 26, 2007 - 10:38 PM) [snapback]551298[/snapback]

I always figured that a rear wheel drive vs. a front wheel drive with the same power, the rear wheel drive will take it any day.


from what i understand fwd (being a smaller and lighter drivetrain) will lose less power than rwd by the time the power from the engine actually hits the ground.

that being said rwd sports cars often have bigger & wider rear tires (they don't need to yaw for steering) so that extra traction will let them use more of the power that makes it to the ground.


example on my reasoning (assuming weights are identical):
50bhp fwd car might be getting 45whp, while a 50bhp rwd car might only make 40whp. so, with such low powers the fwd car would win.

500bhp fwd car getting 450whp, and a 500bhp rwd car getting 400whp. either car can accelerate hard enough to turn their tires into smoke and waste power. but the rwd car probably has bigger & wider rear tires so his tires will keep grip under harder acceleration.

no practical experience with either of these cases, but the physics makes sense.

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
8 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 25th, 2024 - 6:41 AM