"zero interference head"? BS or NOT? |
"zero interference head"? BS or NOT? |
May 17, 2007 - 6:22 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 18, '07 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
so i had a head gasket replaced and now i have no compression in the #4 cyl. i took it to another shop and they said it might be a bent valve, then they asked me if some1 tried 2 start it with the cams in wrong. and thats exactly what the guys that tried 2 fix it were doing when i was at there shop. so i told the guys who did the work and they said it could not b there fualt bcuz its a "zero interference head" and that the cams dont come down enough to bend the valves. BS or NOT?
This post has been edited by SlickRick: May 17, 2007 - 6:23 AM -------------------- Your signature is not allowed on 6GC - Defgeph
|
May 17, 2007 - 8:55 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 25, '06 From Box Elder, South Dakota Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
yes, the 5s/3s engines are non-interference, unless you modify the cylinder head, or pistons.....btw, why did you replace the head gastket?
This post has been edited by 3WayStunna: May 17, 2007 - 8:57 AM -------------------- (\__/)
(='.'=) This is bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination. |
May 17, 2007 - 10:55 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 18, '07 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
QUOTE(3WayStunna @ May 17, 2007 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]558828[/snapback] yes, the 5s/3s engines are non-interference, unless you modify the cylinder head, or pistons.....btw, why did you replace the head gastket? it over heated and blew, the Rad was leaking. -------------------- Your signature is not allowed on 6GC - Defgeph
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 13th, 2025 - 3:20 PM |