"zero interference head"? BS or NOT? |
"zero interference head"? BS or NOT? |
May 17, 2007 - 6:22 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 18, '07 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
so i had a head gasket replaced and now i have no compression in the #4 cyl. i took it to another shop and they said it might be a bent valve, then they asked me if some1 tried 2 start it with the cams in wrong. and thats exactly what the guys that tried 2 fix it were doing when i was at there shop. so i told the guys who did the work and they said it could not b there fualt bcuz its a "zero interference head" and that the cams dont come down enough to bend the valves. BS or NOT?
This post has been edited by SlickRick: May 17, 2007 - 6:23 AM -------------------- Your signature is not allowed on 6GC - Defgeph
|
May 17, 2007 - 11:53 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 19, '04 From austin tx Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
Did you get the head resurfaced? They can warp when overheated; could cause a compression loss if its not perfectly flat.
-------------------- |
May 17, 2007 - 7:42 PM |
|
Moderator Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
QUOTE(mikew04 @ May 17, 2007 - 12:53 PM) [snapback]558876[/snapback] Did you get the head resurfaced? They can warp when overheated; could cause a compression loss if its not perfectly flat. X2. the 5s and 3s engines are non interferance. -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 13th, 2025 - 3:18 PM |