6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> "zero interference head"? BS or NOT?
post May 17, 2007 - 6:22 AM
+Quote Post
SlickRick



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 18, '07
From So Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 3 (100%)




so i had a head gasket replaced and now i have no compression in the #4 cyl. i took it to another shop and they said it might be a bent valve, then they asked me if some1 tried 2 start it with the cams in wrong. and thats exactly what the guys that tried 2 fix it were doing when i was at there shop. so i told the guys who did the work and they said it could not b there fualt bcuz its a "zero interference head" and that the cams dont come down enough to bend the valves. BS or NOT?

This post has been edited by SlickRick: May 17, 2007 - 6:23 AM


--------------------
Your signature is not allowed on 6GC - Defgeph
 
Start new topic
Replies
post May 17, 2007 - 7:54 PM
+Quote Post
tin_foil



Enthusiast
***
Joined Jun 7, '05
From Corvallis, OR
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Yeah, it's true. If it was BS I wouldn't have an engine right now cause the previous owner hadn't replaced the timing belt in over 100K and when I replaced it the belt had slipped nearly a third of the way around from TDC. It makes for a little lower compression ratio on our cars than some, but it's nice when the belt goes. wink.gif


--------------------

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
6 User(s) are reading this topic (6 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: January 13th, 2025 - 3:16 PM