 3SGTE SWAP INTO 96 CELICA ST |
 Jun 26, 2007 - 1:40 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast  Joined Jun 21, '07 From Peachtree City, GA USA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
I'm nearly finished with the swap. Just need to know if its necessary to get a new fuel pump and exhaust. I know its recommended, but I'd rather save some money and do it later. I've already spent 3800 and I dont want to spend anything I don't have to.
|
 |
Replies
|
Jun 27, 2007 - 2:59 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined May 1, '03 From Michigan Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
It all depends on what the end goals are. For a stock 2nd gen 3SGTE, the ST's 160 LPH will be fine. BTW, Its the same pump thats used on the 5S and 3rd gen 3SGE cars. The stock ST185/SW20 is a 170 LPH, which would be a safer bet but at a 6% increase (at 45 psi) its not really gaining that much.
Now for a 3rd gen 3SGTE, the stock 540's (at 75 % duty rate - capable of roughly 330 HP) will be pushing beyond the limits of the stock ST pump. The ST205 / MKIV NA Supra pump (190 LPH )would be better and safer. I am running a Supra TT pump in my all-trac, which has 660's and a TD06 setup. -------------------- Scott
West Michigan |
Posts in this topic
jshawn96 3SGTE SWAP INTO 96 CELICA ST Jun 26, 2007 - 1:40 PM
presure2 QUOTE(jshawn96 @ Jun 26, 2007 - 2:40... Jun 26, 2007 - 1:59 PM scothaniel I'm using the stock ST pump, no problems for o... Jun 27, 2007 - 12:33 PM Silver94CelicaOwner Eh.....It's REALLY not worth the risk using su... Jun 27, 2007 - 1:19 PM Supersprynt QUOTE(scothaniel @ Jun 27, 2007 - 1... Jun 27, 2007 - 1:22 PM presure2 i would NOT trust a 10+ year old, underpowered to ... Jun 30, 2007 - 6:43 PM
scothaniel quick update - the stock ST pump failed around 1... Jul 30, 2007 - 3:04 PM presure2 QUOTE(scothaniel @ Jul 30, 2007 - 4... Jul 30, 2007 - 3:54 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 22nd, 2025 - 1:27 AM |