Rice Burner haters, why????!!!! |
Rice Burner haters, why????!!!! |
Sep 7, 2003 - 7:52 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Jul 25, '03 From Santa Barbara, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
okay, these 2 people were talking about burning out and stuff cause they had their so called "american muscle" cars and i said that my car can burn out pretty well but not really good. so one of them gets pissed off! he tells me "you might be able to PEELout but you cant BURNout"...i didnt know there was a difference!
so then he tells me "you cant even talk in conversations like this cause you have a rice burner you f***er." so then, later, they are talking about how many valves they have in their engines and they both say 2 valves per cylinder and i say "i have 4 valves per cylinder so thats like 16 valves." (not trying to act like my car is better or anything) and the guy gets pissed off again! he's all "no you dont! thats bs." anyway, i tell him im positive because it says right on the engine "16 valves". this just pissed me off very badly. he always talks about how "4 bangers" suck ass. some of them have over 300 hp! plus, he has this crappy $2300 '89 mustang w/a crappy paint job and he thinks his car is sooo much better than mine. he hates all rice burners and i just dont understand how people hate them so much. he knows that i know that his car is faster than mine...but its not slower than **** like he says it is. thank you for listening to my frustration of these kinds of people. This post has been edited by 6gencelicasrule: Sep 7, 2003 - 7:53 PM |
Sep 8, 2003 - 12:42 PM |
|
||
Enthusiast Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
so what if they cant rev over 5000rpm(btw they can and many do have a 6k-6.5k redline) my cousin had a 2000 mustang GT with an off road h pipe, borla exhaust, and CAI as well as 3.73 gears. the car had amazing low end power and was very fast despite the 6k or so redline. sometimes he would rev up really high just to piss off his neighbors. no point in reving past the power band. that is why i like my car more than a honda with Vtec or a new GTS with vvtli. where is the fun in having a car where the power starts after the the power of a lower rpm engine has been fully reached? HP sells cars, torque wins races. performance wise, i will always choose good low end power over high HP #'s at 7krpm+ the vortec 305 and 350 engines in the newer chevy trucks and cars are very well capable of 18-20mpg, which is not bad when you look at the displacment. its the drivers that make the car get 8mpg -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 27th, 2024 - 7:00 PM |