Supreme Court Finally Stands Up For Gun Owners |
Supreme Court Finally Stands Up For Gun Owners |
Jun 26, 2008 - 8:25 PM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 9, '06 From Ma Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
-------------------- |
Jun 28, 2008 - 8:14 AM |
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 21, '07 From Toronto Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
clap clap clap I would like to commend everybody that replied to this thread for it was kept clean, rational and mature...
There is no need for car accidents... but by following your "logic" we should just get rid of seat belts and airbags cause we shouldnt need them??? This is not what I meant... Seatbelts and airbags are meant to prevent you from getting more injuries or be killed thus a positive thing, hand guns are not meant to prevent you from being killed. Seatbelts and airbags are solutions/preventions for accidents and hand guns are not solutions for accidents or crime. Got it? again, 2 wrongs don't make it right. Havok and Griff: Very well said. edit: speaking of prevention for getting killed by a gun, maybe somebody would just invent something like a kevlar that you could use everyday, like incorporate in our daily clothes. lol a bulletproof brief or thong hahahaha This post has been edited by Jeunesse: Jun 28, 2008 - 8:27 AM -------------------- -Derick
"In hoc signo vinces." In this sign thou shalt conquer." Gone but never forgotten.... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 10th, 2025 - 11:32 PM |