6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> air to air vs air to water, I've been reading mixed reviews
post Aug 14, 2008 - 4:15 PM
+Quote Post
enderswift



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jul 12, '08
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




the addition of pumps resevoirs and maintanance aside, why do alot of people say that air to air is better than air to water? I'd imagine that with air to water you can run ALOT less piping like the 3sgte. This is good because it means the tubo has to pressurize less piping before it gets to the engine. I.E less lag. Some people say water intercoolers run warmer but I dont see how. If you run the intercooler the way the gt4 has it, then route a radiator to the snout the heat exchange should be the same no? or is that the benefit of less piping is offset by a loss of efficiency?


--------------------
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Aug 16, 2008 - 9:50 PM
+Quote Post
bccentaur3



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 29, '07
From Hoyt Lakes, MN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




Thats what I've got.

dump valve ftw.


--------------------
98 Celica gt red- totaled deer
94 Celica st black DD (bad weather beater)- totaled deer
95 Celica gt silver- chassis sold
88 Celica All-Trac (Burned to a crisp)
94 Celica gt white (sold)

In need of a rust free chassis!!!!

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: January 11th, 2025 - 4:05 AM