![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 23, '07 From Dallas, TX Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
One of the few things that I dislike about my '99 Celica Convertible is that the gas mileage isn't as good as it could be. The 1997-2001 Camry, which had the same engine, got 3 mpg better on the highway with a 5-speed than my Celica does with a 5-speed, and the Camry weighed about 300 lbs more! I can only attribute this to the high revs of my Celica's 5th gear. So, my question is, can I achieve better fuel economy with a larger diameter wheel/tire combination? I know it would throw my speedometer off a bit, but to save fuel, it would be worth it to me. On that same note, what would would the tallest tire that I could put on a 16" rim and not suffer from any fender rubbing? What about a 17" rim? Thanks for your help!
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) ![]() |
Wheel size alone can not be used as an indicator of weight. It all depends on the particular design, and there are better and worse ones out there. I would bet you can find 18" wheels with low profile tires that will weigh considerably less than the same overall height/width combo in a 15 or 16" wheel. this is very true. I can produce 18s that weight a LOT less than a set of 15s.....now tell me who on this site will put enough $ into their wheels that they'll buy $2000+ rims (alone) for some quality LTW wheels over your $1000 18" set of HP racing/AXIS ect. yes i'm being bad and assuming the OP like 90% of this car culture will buy generic wheels. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: February 17th, 2025 - 12:04 AM |